Cited by 5Characterization and Applications of Magnetic NanoparticlesNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryMicro and Nano Robotics

Reduced Steering Performance in Magnetic Drug Targeting Induced by Shielding Arising from Accumulation of Particles

Open access
Thalmayer, Angelika S., Zeising, Samuel, Fischer, Georg·2022·Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Magnetic Drug Targeting is a new approach in cancer therapy, where magnetic nanoparticles are used as carriers for cancer drugs. Commonly, external magnets are employed for steering the particles inside the blood vessels towards a desired direction. However, an unwanted side effect of the steering is the accumulation of the particles underneath the steering magnet. Many researchers address the number of accumulated particles, but, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, the retroaction of the accumulation profile on the generated magnetic field and, therefore, on the magnetic steering force, has not been investigated so far. Thus, in the proposed study, the influence of the accumulation profile on the magnetic force was numerically investigated. Therefore, a 2D model of a blood vessel with particles assumed as an accumulation profile and a nearby magnet was examined. Moreover, the length, thickness, and effective susceptibility of the approximated accumulation profile and the magnet size were varied. The results reveal that the field distribution is significantly affected, especially for high effective susceptibilities. The initially applied profile amplified the magnetic force; however, when the profile accumulated, it reduced the force up to 50 %. Overall, the results reveal that the retroaction of the particle distribution on the magnetic field must be considered in a simulation model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/cdbme-2022-1143

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Nacev A, Komaee A, Sarwar A, Probst R, Kim SH, Emmert- Buck M, et al. Towards Control of Magnetic Fluids in Patients: Directing Therapeutic Nanoparticles to Disease Locations. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 2012;32:32-74.
  2. Friedrich RP, Janko C, Unterweger H, Lyer S, Alexiou C. Nanoparticles: SPIONs and magnetic hybrid materials: Syn- thesis, toxicology and biomedical applications. Physical Sci- ences Reviews 2021.
  3. Thalmayer AS, Zeising S, Fischer G, Kirchner J. Steering Magnetic Nanoparticles by Utilizing an Adjustable Linear Halbach Array. Kleinheubach Conference 2021;1-4.
  4. Chakrabarty P, Roy S, Paily RP. Stiction Mitigation of Nanoparticles in Magnetically Targeted Drug Delivery Sys- tem. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2022;58:1-10.
  5. Gitter K, Odenbach S. Investigations on a Branched Tube Model in Magnetic Drug Targeting-Systematic Measure- ments and Simulation. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2013;49:343-348.
  6. Manshadi MKD, Saadat M, Mohammadi M, Kamali R, Shamsi M, Naseh M, et al. Magnetic aerosol drug target- ing in lung cancer therapy using permanent magnet. Drug Delivery 2019;26:120-128.
  7. Myrovali E, Papadopoulos K, Iglesias I, Spasova M, Farle M, Wiedwald U, et al. Long-Range Ordering Effects in Mag- netic Nanoparticles. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021;13:21602-21612.
  8. Zafar M, Ullah MS, Manzoor T, Ali M, Nazar K, Iqbal S, et al. Performance Analysis of Magnetic Nanoparticles during Targeted Drug Delivery: Application of OHAM. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences 2022;130:723-749.
  9. Mullins CE. Magnetic Susceptibility of the Soil and its Sig- nificance in Soil Science -a Review. Journal of Soil Science 2006;28:223-246.
  10. Klohs J, Hirt AM. Investigation of the magnetic susceptibil- ity properties of fresh and fixed mouse heart, liver, skeletal muscle and brain tissue. Physica Medica 2021;88:37-44.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thalmayer, A. S., Zeising, S., & Fischer, G.
Affiliations
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Thalmayer, Angelika S.
Venue
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Published
2022-08-01
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
560-563
ISSN
2364-5504 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4294218569
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Micro and Nano Robotics
Keywords
magnetic drug delivery, magnetic nanoparticles, magnetic steering, particle accumulation, magnetic field distribution, magnetic force, blood vessel model, magnet size, effective susceptibility, cancer therapy, magnetic shielding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review