Cited by 119Mediatization and Communication for Social ChangeNews Media Framing and Political CommunicationMedia and Digital Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mediatization – Empirical perspectives: An introduction to a special issue

Hepp, Andreas, Hjarvard, Stig, Lundby, Knut·2010·Communications

Abstract

In general, the concept of mediatization tries to capture long-term interrelation processes between media change on the one hand and social and cultural change on the other. As institutionalized and technological means of communication, media have become integral to very different contexts of human life. The media are not just neutral instances of mediation: Media like television, radio, newspaper, the web or the mobile phone are in themselves mediators of social and cultural change. Within media and communication studies two strands of research, medium theory and effect research, have in very different ways addressed this ‘influence’ of media on processes of social and cultural change. Medium theory describes socio-cultural change as deeply structured by the advent of a new leading medium, and constructs human history as the succession of oral, scribal, print and electronic cultures (cf. for example, Meyrowitz, 1995). Approaches of media effect research analyze the rather short-term impact of certain media content on the social world (cf. for example, Rosengren, 1994). Both kinds of approaches have contributed to the understanding of the relationship between media, culture and society, but they clearly have some shortcomings. Medium theory conceptualizes the relation between one medium and its socio-cultural influence too directly and neglects questions of media content. Effect research theorizes the influence of certain media contents too directly and neglects questions of…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/comm.2010.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1177/1461444808089414 · DOI
  2. Hjarvard S., 2008, Nordicom Review, 29, 105, 10.1515/nor-2017-0181 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1177/146954050200200101 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02584.x · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01401.x · DOI
  6. 10.1177/0267323104040696 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hepp, A., Hjarvard, S., & Lundby, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Bremen (DE)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Venue
Communications
Published
2010-01
Volume
35
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0341-2059 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-4087
OpenAlex
W2143688438
Cited by
119
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Mediatization and Communication for Social Change
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
mediatization, media change, sociocultural change, medium theory, media influence, media content, medium specificity, cultural context, media-saturated society, media and culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review