Cited by 132Medical Malpractice and Liability IssuesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPatient Safety and Medication Errors

Medical Errors, Malpractice, and Defensive Medicine: An Ill-Fated Triad

Berlin, Leonard·2017·Diagnosis

Abstract

For the first 180 years following the founding of the US, physicians occasionally were sued for medical malpractice. Allegations of negligence were errors of commission – i.e. the physician made a mistake by doing something wrong, usually mistreatment of a fracture or dislocation, a complication or death following a surgical procedure, prescribing the wrong medication, and after the discovery of the X-ray by Roentgen in 1895, causing radiation burns. In the mid twentieth century malpractice allegations slowly changed from errors of commission to errors of omission – i.e. the physician failed to do something right: almost always, failed to make a diagnosis. The number of malpractice lawsuits increased at a geometric rate beginning in the 1960s, and in the 1970s physicians began practicing defensive medicine, which lead physicians to order unnecessary radiology exams and tests. In the past 20 years the number of malpractice lawsuits has been decreasing, but the practice of defensive medicine has continued. Unnecessary exams and tests increase the likelihood of overdiagnosis and overtreatment, i.e. a new kind of error of commission.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/dx-2017-0007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinicians facing diagnostic errors, especially those leading to patient harm, may face malpractice claims and disciplinary measures from state medical boards.

    “However, when faced with diagnostic errors, especially those leading to patient harm, clinicians may face malpractice claims, resulting in possible disciplinary measures from state medical boards [340], such as license suspension or revocation, probation, reprimands, fines, mandatory retraining, or practice restrictions [341].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 43 · Cited by 132

Authors
Berlin, L.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Berlin, Leonard
Venue
Diagnosis
Published
2017-08-14
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
133-139
ISSN
  • 2194-8011 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-802X
OpenAlex
W2748469539
Cited by
132
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 29 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diagnosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
medical errors, medical malpractice, defensive medicine, commission errors, omission errors, medical malpractice litigation, unnecessary testing, overdiagnosis, overtreatment, physician negligence
MeSH terms
Defensive Medicine, Humans, Malpractice, Radiology, Medical Errors, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review