Medical Errors, Malpractice, and Defensive Medicine: An Ill-Fated Triad
Abstract
For the first 180 years following the founding of the US, physicians occasionally were sued for medical malpractice. Allegations of negligence were errors of commission – i.e. the physician made a mistake by doing something wrong, usually mistreatment of a fracture or dislocation, a complication or death following a surgical procedure, prescribing the wrong medication, and after the discovery of the X-ray by Roentgen in 1895, causing radiation burns. In the mid twentieth century malpractice allegations slowly changed from errors of commission to errors of omission – i.e. the physician failed to do something right: almost always, failed to make a diagnosis. The number of malpractice lawsuits increased at a geometric rate beginning in the 1960s, and in the 1970s physicians began practicing defensive medicine, which lead physicians to order unnecessary radiology exams and tests. In the past 20 years the number of malpractice lawsuits has been decreasing, but the practice of defensive medicine has continued. Unnecessary exams and tests increase the likelihood of overdiagnosis and overtreatment, i.e. a new kind of error of commission.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clinicians facing diagnostic errors, especially those leading to patient harm, may face malpractice claims and disciplinary measures from state medical boards.
“However, when faced with diagnostic errors, especially those leading to patient harm, clinicians may face malpractice claims, resulting in possible disciplinary measures from state medical boards [340], such as license suspension or revocation, probation, reprimands, fines, mandatory retraining, or practice restrictions [341].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [340]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 43 · Cited by 132
- Authors
- Berlin, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Berlin, Leonard
- ORCID
- Berlin, Leonard
- Venue
- Diagnosis
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2017-08-14
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 133-139
- ISSN
- 2194-8011 (ISSN-L)
- 2194-802X
- OpenAlex
- W2748469539
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 29 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diagnosis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Keywords
- medical errors, medical malpractice, defensive medicine, commission errors, omission errors, medical malpractice litigation, unnecessary testing, overdiagnosis, overtreatment, physician negligence
- MeSH terms
- Defensive Medicine, Humans, Malpractice, Radiology, Medical Errors, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review