Discrepancy between emergency department admission diagnosis and hospital discharge diagnosis and its impact on length of stay, up-triage to the intensive care unit, and mortality
Abstract
Objectives: Published discrepancy rates between emergency department (ED) and hospital discharge (HD) diagnoses vary widely (from 6.5 to 75.6%). The goal of this study was to determine the extent of diagnostic discrepancy and its impact on length of hospital stay (LOS), up-triage to the intensive care unit (ICU) and in-hospital mortality. Methods: A retrospective chart review of adult patients admitted from the ED to a hospitalist service at a tertiary hospital was performed. The ED and HD diagnoses were compared and classified as concordant, discordant, or symptom diagnoses according to predefined criteria. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the associations of diagnostic discordance with in-hospital mortality and up-triage to the ICU. A linear regression model was used for the length of stay. Results: Of the 636 patients whose records were reviewed, 418 (217 [51.9%] women, with a mean age of 64.1 years) were included. Overall, 318 patients (76%) had concordant diagnoses, while 91 (21.77%) had discordant diagnoses. Only 9 patients (2.15%) had symptom diagnoses. A discordant diagnosis was associated with increased mortality (OR: 3.64; 95% CI: 1.026–12.91; p=0.045) and up-triage to the ICU (OR: 5.51; 95% CI: 2.43–12.5; p<0.001). The median LOS was significantly greater for patients with discordant diagnoses (7 days) than for those with concordant diagnoses (4.7 days) (p=0.004). Symptom diagnosis did not affect the mortality or ICU up-triage. Conclusions: One in five hospitalized patients had discordant HD and admission diagnoses. This diagnostic discrepancy was associated with significant impacts on patient morbidity and mortality.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Diagnostic suggestions were classified according to procedures described by Hautz et al. and Bastakoti et al.
“Diagnostic suggestions were classified by the raters as identical, plausible, or diagnostically different, according to the procedures described by Hautz et al. [16] and Bastakoti et al. [17].”
From Diagnostic performance of Prof. Valmed, ChatGPT-5 Thinking, and OpenEvidence in rheumatology: A comparative evaluation (2026) · cites this paper as Bastakoti et al. [17]
Cites
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.07.045120 · Cited by 1,632 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kremer, P., Langballe, E., Haase, I., Bamberger, J., Kuhn, S., Krusche, M., & Knitza, J. (2026) · Rheumatology International · doi:10.1007/s00296-025-06068-y · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Diag - nostic suggestions were classified by the raters as identical, 1 3 plausible, or diagnostically different, according to the proce - dures described by Hautz et al. [16] and Bastakoti et al. [17].”
- Authors
- Bastakoti, M., Muhailan, M., Nassar, A., Sallam, T., Desale, S., Fouda, R., Ammar, H., & Cole, C.
- Affiliations
- MedStar Washington Hospital Center (US)
- MedStar Health Research Institute (US)
- George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ammar, Hussam
- Venue
- Diagnosis
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2021-07-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107-114
- ISSN
- 2194-8011 (ISSN-L)
- 2194-802X
- OpenAlex
- W3180465190
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 4.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diagnosis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Graduate Medical Education program at MedStar Washington Hospital Center
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Keywords
- diagnostic discordance, hospital discharge diagnoses, length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, symptom-based diagnosis, hospitalist care, emergency department discharge
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Discharge, Retrospective Studies, Triage, Tertiary Care Centers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review