Cited by 5X-ray Diffraction in CrystallographyMicrostructure and mechanical propertiesMetallurgy and Material Forming

Line-Profile Analysis Combined with Texture Analysis for Characterizing Dislocation Distribution in Texture Components of Cold-Rolled Copper Sheets

Open access
Satoh, Kozue, Sato, Shigeo, Yamanaka, Kenta, Suzuki, Shigeru, Chiba, Akihiko, Wagatsuma, Kazuaki·2016·High Temperature Materials and Processes

Abstract

We described a newly developed characterization technique that dislocation density could be individually determined for each texture component of plastically deformed metals by combining the line-profile analysis with the texture analysis by using X-ray diffraction. This method was applied to major texture components of cube, copper, and brass evolved in cold-rolled copper sheets. The Warren–Averbach procedure using two diffraction peaks was used for estimating the dislocation density. An increase in the dislocation density with the rolling reduction was evaluated for individual texture components. Although the individual texture components underwent the different slip paths, the dislocation densities in these texture components were almost comparable; however, the non-texture component was shown to have a higher dislocation density than the texture components. The recovery and recrystallization proceeded preferentially in the non-texture component.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/htmp-2015-0039

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Cu sheet in the as-received condition has a Vickers hardness of 135 ± 6 HV, matching typical cold-rolled pure copper at a high deformation level.

    “For the Cu sheet, the obtained value (135 ± 6 HV) matches the typical Vickers hardness of a cold-rolled pure copper sheet at a high deformation level [26].”

    From Solid-State Diffusion Bonding of Aluminum to Copper for Bimetallic Anode Fabrication (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Experimental procedures (Sample; page unavailable) report Vickers hardness measurements on pure copper sheets cold-rolled at reductions up to 85%, with hardness increasing as reduction increased. The cited paper therefore supports the high-deformation comparison, but our copy gives no numerical hardness value to establish that the citing authors’ 135 ± 6 HV matches it. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Copper hardness decreases from 135 to 80 HV after bonding.

    “The hardness of AA2024 aluminum sheets decreases from 139 to 100 HV, and copper experiences similar softening, with values dropping from 135 to 80 HV [26].”

    From Solid-State Diffusion Bonding of Aluminum to Copper for Bimetallic Anode Fabrication (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

    The section on dislocation recovery and recrystallization reports that copper hardness decreased during annealing, so it supports copper softening in a different condition. The Experimental procedures describe rolling and annealing, not bonding, and the text does not give the claimed decrease from 135 to 80 HV. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The hardness of AA2024 aluminum sheets decreases from 139 to 100 HV after bonding.

    “The hardness of AA2024 aluminum sheets decreases from 139 to 100 HV, and copper experiences similar softening, with values dropping from 135 to 80 HV [26].”

    From Solid-State Diffusion Bonding of Aluminum to Copper for Bimetallic Anode Fabrication (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Experimental procedures section describes tests on pure copper sheets, not AA2024 aluminum. A search for AA2024, bonding, and the 139-to-100 HV change found no passage in our copy addressing the attributed claim; the reported hardness decrease concerns annealed copper instead. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. A.R. Stokes, Proc. Phys. Soc., 61 (1948) 382-391.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Satoh, K., Sato, S., Yamanaka, K., Suzuki, S., Chiba, A., & Wagatsuma, K.
Affiliations
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Ibaraki University (JP)
Corresponding author
Satoh, Kozue
Venue
High Temperature Materials and Processes
Published
2016-07-27
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
705-713
ISSN
  • 0334-6455 (ISSN-L)
  • 2191-0324
OpenAlex
W2491036989
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • High Temperature Materials and Processes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (14J07212, 267212)
  • Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Microstructure and mechanical properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Metallurgy and Material Forming
Keywords
dislocation density, crystallographic texture, line profile analysis, Warren-Averbach method, cube texture, copper texture, brass texture, recovery, recrystallization, rolling reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review