Cited by 113Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesFood composition and propertiesProteins in Food Systems

Effects of Pea Protein on the Properties of Potato Starch-Based 3D Printing Materials

Chuanxing, Feng, Qi, Wang, Hui, Li, Quancheng, Zhou, Wang, Meng·2018·International Journal of Food Engineering

Abstract

Since materials are the substantial foundation for 3D printing, the lack of theoretical research on 3D printing food materials restricts the development of 3D printing in food field. Based on the principle of 3D starch gelatinization printing, this study revealed the effects of pea protein on the printability of potato starch-based 3D printing materials in granular structure, crystalline structure, chemical structure, textural properties, and thermal properties, through scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transformed infrared, differential scanning calorimetry, and textural method, and developed new food materials for 3D printing. The study indicated the structural properties and physicochemical properties changed regularly with the increase in the content of pea protein, when the content of pea protein was 1%, the printing quality was best. The study provides a new theory for the application of 3D printing in food production and technical support for actual production.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/ijfe-2017-0297

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microbial safety concerns necessitate sanitization of printer parts because bacterial concentrations were found in printed foods.

    “There is also mention of microbial safety concerns necessitating the sanitization of printer parts, due to bacterial concentrations found in printed foods, emphasizing the importance of hygiene in food 3D printing [76,100].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 113

Authors
Chuanxing, F., Qi, W., Hui, L., Quancheng, Z., & Wang, M.
Affiliations
  • Shandong University of Technology (CN)
  • Shandong Provincial Universities Key Laboratory of Functionalization Technologies for Agricultural Products, School of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science , Shandong University of Technology , Zibo 255049, China
Venue
International Journal of Food Engineering
Published
2018-03-01
Volume
14
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1556-3758 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-5764
OpenAlex
W2799286669
Cited by
113
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Food Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
Keywords
pea protein, potato starch, 3D food printing, starch gelatinization, printability, granular structure, crystal structure, thermal properties, textural properties, protein content, food materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review