A creative approach for undergraduate nursing students to learn anatomy and physiology: a qualitative exploratory study
Abstract
Anatomy and Physiology (A&P) courses in undergraduate nursing programs are often considered challenging for students. Typically, a wide variety of teaching strategies, including dissection, experiments, illustrations and photographs are used to engage students. This study aimed to explore and describe the learning experiences of an open creative assessment task on undergraduate nursing students of learning A&P. A total of eight students participated in semi-structured interviews. Two major themes emerged from the data, this included ‘Bringing A&P to life’ which included two sub-themes of ‘Learning through peer teaching’ and ‘An easy way to learn’, with the second major theme, ‘Custom made learning’ which included four sub-themes, ‘To grade or not to grade’, ‘Catering for different learning styles’, ‘Logistics of group work’, and ‘Effect of group dynamics’. This qualitative exploratory study contributes to further pedagogical insights into art and/or creative approaches to teaching.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These subjects are widely recognized as cognitively demanding for students because they involve complex spatial structures, intricate tissue morphology, and dynamic developmental processes.
“However, these subjects are widely recognized as cognitively demanding for students because they involve complex spatial structures, intricate tissue morphology, and dynamic developmental processes [2, 3].”
Anatomy and histology & embryology involve highly structured knowledge systems with complex hierarchical relationships among concepts.
“Anatomy and histology & embryology involve highly structured knowledge systems with complex hierarchical relationships among concepts [2, 3].”
Cites
A revision of bloom's taxonomy: an overview
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2 · Cited by 8,132 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhao, C., Zhu, J., Liu, J., Zhao, W., & Pang, Y. (2026) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-026-09469-0 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Anatomy and histology & embryology involve highly structured knowledge systems with complex hierarchical relationships among concepts [2, 3].”
- Authors
- Barbagallo, M. S., Porter, J. E., Abdelkader, A., & James, A.
- Affiliations
- Federation University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Barbagallo, Michael S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2022-01-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1548-923X (ISSN-L)
- 2194-5772
- OpenAlex
- W4282939154
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
- Keywords
- anatomy and physiology education, undergraduate nursing students, creative assessment, peer teaching, grading, learning styles, group work, group dynamics, arts-based education, student learning experience
- MeSH terms
- Curriculum, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Learning, Students, Nursing, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review