PERSISTENCE OF FOSSILIZATION
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mukattash (1986) believed that grammar is considered a complex area for second language learners, especially for Arabic speakers learning English.
“Further, Mukattash (1986) believed that grammar is considered a complex area for second language learners, especially for Arabic speakers learning English.”
From Overcoming error fossilization in academic writing: strategies for Saudi EFL learners to move beyond the plateau (2024) · cites this paper as Mukattash (1986)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Albelihi, H. H. M., & Al-Ahdal, A. (2024) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-024-00303-y · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Further, Mukattash (1986) believed that grammar is considered a complex area for second language learners, especially for Arabic speakers learning English.”
- Authors
- Mukattash, L.
- Corresponding author
- Mukattash, Lewis
- Venue
- IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1986
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1-4
- ISSN
- 0019-042X (ISSN-L)
- 1613-4141
- OpenAlex
- W2087286704
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Keywords
- fossilization, language learning, second language acquisition, language proficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
