OMEX metadata specification (version 1.2)
Open accessAbstract
A standardized approach to annotating computational biomedical models and their associated files can facilitate model reuse and reproducibility among research groups, enhance search and retrieval of models and data, and enable semantic comparisons between models. Motivated by these potential benefits and guided by consensus across the COmputational Modeling in BIology NEtwork (COMBINE) community, we have developed a specification for encoding annotations in Open Modeling and EXchange (OMEX)-formatted archives. This document details version 1.2 of the specification, which builds on version 1.0 published last year in this journal. In particular, this version includes a set of initial model-level annotations (whereas v 1.0 described exclusively annotations at a smaller scale). Additionally, this version uses best practices for namespaces, and introduces omex-library.org as a common root for all annotations. Distributing modeling projects within an OMEX archive is a best practice established by COMBINE, and the OMEX metadata specification presented here provides a harmonized, community-driven approach for annotating a variety of standardized model representations. This specification acts as a technical guideline for developing software tools that can support this standard, and thereby encourages broad advances in model reuse, discovery, and semantic analyses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Gennari, J. H., König, M., Misirli, G., Neal, M. L., Nickerson, D. P., & Waltemath, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- Keele University , Newcastle , UK
- Seattle Children's Research Institute (US)
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Universität Greifswald (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Gennari, John H.
- Venue
- Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2021-09-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1432-4385 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-4516
- PMC
- PMC8560343
- OpenAlex
- W3206868055
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Berichte aus der medizinischen Informatik und Bioinformatik/Journal of integrative bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Keele Research Repository (Keele University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIH, USA) & Federal Ministry of Education and Research (P41 GM109824, 031L0054)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- metadata specification, model annotation, model reuse, reproducibility, model discovery, namespaces, combines, model archive
- MeSH terms
- Metadata, Semantics, Software, Reproducibility of Results, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review