The effect of attending a prenatal childbirth preparedness course on labor duration and outcomes
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of attending a prenatal childbirth preparation course (CPC) on labor duration and outcomes. Methods: A cross sectional study of 53 primiparous women who attended and 54 women who did not attend a CPC was conducted. The state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) score was used to diagnose anxiety. Clinical and obstetrical data were collected from the perinatal database of our center. Through post-partum interviews, coping strategies were assessed, patients graded their childbirth experience and breastfeeding was evaluated. Data were analyzed using description analyses and a P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The STAI score was significantly lower in the study group compared with controls (P=0.025). The first stage and the entire duration of labor were significantly shorter (P=0.036 and P=0.026, respectively) in women who attended the CPC. No significant differences were found with regard to the mode of delivery, rate of episiotomy, use of analgesics and neonatal outcomes between the groups. Women in the study group rated their labor experience significantly higher (P=0.016) and exhibited significantly higher rates of breastfeeding (P<0.001) than controls. Conclusions: The knowledge acquired in the CPC has positive effects on the course of labor and delivery outcomes as well as higher rates of breastfeeding.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prenatal courses aim to impart knowledge to future parents, reduce anxiety associated with the arrival of the new baby, and prevent perinatal depression symptoms.
“These courses aim not only to impart knowledge to future parents but also to reduce anxiety associated with the arrival of the new baby and prevent perinatal depression symptoms [25].”
From Implementation of a mental health promotion intervention in a high-risk pregnancy unit: the “Ombrelles” program (2025) · cites this paper as [25]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 20
- Authors
- Yohai, D., Alharar, D., Cohen, R., Kaltian, Z., Aricha-Tamir, B., Ben Aion, S., Yohai, Z., & Weintraub, A. Y.
- Affiliations
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Soroka University Medical center, Faculty of Health Sciences , Ben-Gurion University of the Negev , Beer Sheva , Israel
- Corresponding author
- Weintraub, Adi Y.
- ORCID
- Weintraub, Adi Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Perinatal Medicine
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2017-02-28
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-52
- ISSN
- 0300-5577 (ISSN-L)
- 1619-3997
- OpenAlex
- W2593253275
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Perinatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Keywords
- childbirth preparation courses, prenatal education, labor duration, primiparous women, anxiety, coping strategies, childbirth experience, breastfeeding, mode of delivery, episiotomy, analgesic use, neonatal outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Breast Feeding, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Israel, Labor, Obstetric, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Young Adult, Prenatal Education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review