Cited by 20Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

The effect of attending a prenatal childbirth preparedness course on labor duration and outcomes

Yohai, David, Alharar, Debi, Cohen, Ruthi, Kaltian, Zohar, Aricha-Tamir, Barak, Ben Aion, Saviona, Yohai, Zehava, Weintraub, Adi Y.·2018·Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of attending a prenatal childbirth preparation course (CPC) on labor duration and outcomes. Methods: A cross sectional study of 53 primiparous women who attended and 54 women who did not attend a CPC was conducted. The state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) score was used to diagnose anxiety. Clinical and obstetrical data were collected from the perinatal database of our center. Through post-partum interviews, coping strategies were assessed, patients graded their childbirth experience and breastfeeding was evaluated. Data were analyzed using description analyses and a P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The STAI score was significantly lower in the study group compared with controls (P=0.025). The first stage and the entire duration of labor were significantly shorter (P=0.036 and P=0.026, respectively) in women who attended the CPC. No significant differences were found with regard to the mode of delivery, rate of episiotomy, use of analgesics and neonatal outcomes between the groups. Women in the study group rated their labor experience significantly higher (P=0.016) and exhibited significantly higher rates of breastfeeding (P<0.001) than controls. Conclusions: The knowledge acquired in the CPC has positive effects on the course of labor and delivery outcomes as well as higher rates of breastfeeding.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/jpm-2016-0345

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 20

Authors
Yohai, D., Alharar, D., Cohen, R., Kaltian, Z., Aricha-Tamir, B., Ben Aion, S., Yohai, Z., & Weintraub, A. Y.
Affiliations
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Soroka University Medical center, Faculty of Health Sciences , Ben-Gurion University of the Negev , Beer Sheva , Israel
Corresponding author
Weintraub, Adi Y.
Venue
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Published
2017-02-28
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
47-52
ISSN
  • 0300-5577 (ISSN-L)
  • 1619-3997
OpenAlex
W2593253275
Cited by
20
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Perinatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
childbirth preparation courses, prenatal education, labor duration, primiparous women, anxiety, coping strategies, childbirth experience, breastfeeding, mode of delivery, episiotomy, analgesic use, neonatal outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Feeding, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Israel, Labor, Obstetric, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Young Adult, Prenatal Education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review