Short communications
Abstract
A prospective study was carried out to evaluate the significance and efficacy of routine hospital bed rest in prevention of premature birth and pregnancy complications compared to specialized antenatal care at the outpatient clinic of 73 twin pregnancies. The twin pregnancies were screened in health centers by means of symphysis-fundus measurement, and the diagnosis was confirmed by ultrasound examination at the outpatient clinic. On the average the ultrasonic diagnosis was performed during the 23rd gestational week; at this visit the women were divided into two groups with similar follow-up to the end of the 29th gestational week. At this stage one of the groups was hospitalized unless there had been indications for earlier admission. In the hospital group, the mean for gestational week at delivery was 36.7 (+/- 2.4) and in the outpatient group 37.4 (+/- 1.8) respectively (N.S.). There was no difference in the rate of pregnancy complications between the groups too. No statistical differences in the perinatal mortality (7.1% and 1.1% respectively) or birthweights of the newborns were found, either. Present results do not support the idea of using routine hospital bed rest. It could not be proved to have positive effects on the gestational age, birth weight and perinatal mortality of the newborns, nor to the pregnancy complications. In our opinion early diagnosis of twin pregnancy is of decisive importance and specialized ambulatory follow-up could be employed instead of routi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hartikainen-Sorri 1984 was excluded because participants were allocated to intervention or control according to their year of birth.
“We excluded the other trial because participants were allocated to the intervention or control group according to their year of birth (Hartikainen-Sorri 1984).”
From Bed rest with and without hospitalisation in multiple pregnancy for improving perinatal outcomes (2017) · cites this paper as Hartikainen-Sorri 1984
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 16 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- Hartikainen-Sorri, A. L., & Jouppila, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Perinatal Medicine
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1984-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-42
- ISSN
- 0300-5577 (ISSN-L)
- 1619-3997
- OpenAlex
- W2338232910
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Perinatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- twin pregnancy, hospitalization, prenatal care, preterm birth, pregnancy complications, perinatal mortality, birth weight, gestational age, outpatient follow-up
- MeSH terms
- Ambulatory Care, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy, Multiple, Prenatal Care, Prospective Studies, Random Allocation, Twins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review