Cited by 3Topological Materials and PhenomenaQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian PhysicsNonlinear Photonic Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 1 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Optical Zitterbewegung effect in arrays of helical waveguides

Open access

Abstract

Owing to its topological properties and band collapse, Floquet helical photonic lattices have gained increasing attention as a purely classical setting to realize the optical analogues of a wide variety of quantum phenomena. We demonstrate both theoretically and numerically that light propagation in an appropriately designed helical superlattice can exhibit spatial photonic Zitterbewegung effect, i.e., a quiver spatial oscillatory motion of the beam center of mass around its mean trajectory, in both one‐ and two‐dimensional cases. The lattice spacing determines the effective coupling strength between adjacent helical waveguides, and further drastically not only affects the oscillation amplitude and frequency, but also invert their direction of drift when the effective coupling strength is tuned from positive to negative. Complete arrest and inversion of the drift direction of Zitterbewegung effect are reported.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper theoretically and numerically shows that light propagating in one- and two-dimensional Floquet photonic lattices of helical waveguides can mimic the relativistic Zitterbewegung (ZB) effect as a spatial quivering motion of the beam center of mass. Tuning the effective coupling via lattice spacing can arrest the ZB oscillation or reverse its drift direction.

Key findings

  • In 1D helical waveguide arrays, the Floquet quasi-energy spectrum forms two minibands whose dispersion near the Brillouin-zone edge resembles positive- and negative-energy branches of a massive Dirac particle, enabling optical ZB. For \(d_1/d_2 = 0.8\), the numerical oscillation period is \(T = 0.64\) m, agreeing with the theoretical \(T = 2\pi/\beta\).
  • The effective coupling \(c_{\text{eff1}}\) can be tuned from positive to negative by changing \(d_1\). At \(d_{1\text{cr}} = 1.66 d_2\), \(c_{\text{eff1}} = 0\), producing a flat band, complete band collapse, dynamic localization, and arrest of ZB; for larger \(d_1\), the ZB drift direction reverses.
  • In 2D helical waveguide arrays based on coupled vertical and horizontal SSH chains, ZB-like lateral motion occurs with oscillation periods \(T = 0.15\) m, \(0.13\) m, and \(0.10\) m for \(d_1/d_2 = 1.5\), \(1.66\), and \(2.2\), respectively. At \(d_1/d_2 = 1.66\), the beam oscillates without lateral shift; for \(d_1/d_2 = 1.5\) and \(2.2\), the lateral shift appears in opposite quadrants.
  • The optical ZB is robust against random coupling-strength perturbations up to \(\delta = 0.1\) (10%). Helix spatial period also controls the effect: ZB oscillations occur in regions \(n>0\) and \(n<0\) at \(Z = 0.40\) cm and \(0.23\) cm, respectively, with undamped amplitude at \(Z = 0.31\) cm.

Methods

  • The authors derive a Schrödinger-type paraxial equation for light in helical waveguides, transform to a co-moving frame, and reduce the system to tight-binding coupled-mode equations with effective couplings \(c_{\text{eff1}} = c(d_1)J_0(k_0 R\Omega d_1)\) and \(c_{\text{eff2}} = c(d_2)J_0(k_0 R\Omega d_2)\).
  • Floquet quasi-energy spectra and band structures are calculated analytically and compared with direct numerical propagation. In 1D, the model uses more than 400 dimers and a broad Gaussian beam with \(w_0 = 10d\); in 2D, a broad circular Gaussian beam with \(w_0 = 6d\) is used.
  • Beam dynamics are obtained by directly solving the coupled-mode equations, and the center-of-energy evolution is compared with analytical expressions for the ZB frequency \(\omega_{\text{ZB}} = 2|c_{\text{eff1}} - c_{\text{eff2}}|\) and amplitude \(R_{\text{ZB}} = \pi c_{\text{eff1}}/\omega_{\text{ZB}}\).

Limitations

  • The paper does not include an explicit limitations section. It presents theoretical and numerical results only; no experimental realization is reported.
  • The text notes that damping of ZB oscillations is visible and attributes it to angular spectral broadening of the launching broad Gaussian beam.
  • Boundary effects are said to be reduced by using more than 400 dimers, and robustness is tested only against random coupling-strength perturbations up to 10%; other disorder or fabrication imperfections are not explored in the provided text.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/nanoph-2024-0329

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 1 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 24 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 16
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
16 of 16
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The array is excited by a broad beam G(x) tilted at the Bragg angle, with modes excited with nearly equal amplitude and a phase difference between adjacent waveguides equal to π/2 across the array.

    “Let us assume that the array is excited by a broad beam G(x) tilted at the Bragg angle, the modes are excited with a nearly equal amplitude, but the phase difference between adjacent waveguides is equal to π/2 across the array.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The coupling strength c(d1,2) decays exponentially with distance as c = c0 exp(−bd).

    “c(d 1,2) is the coupling strength, and assumed to be decay exponentially with the distance c = c 0 exp(−bd) [29], [30]”
2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Oscillation period is said to increase with the band gap

    Major

    The paper states that the ZB frequency equals the gap and that the period is 2π divided by the gap. An increasing gap therefore implies a decreasing period, not an increasing one.

  • Two-dimensional period formula uses a negative eigenvalue

    Minor

    The paper defines E 3 as negative, but then gives T = 2π/E 3, which would be a negative period. The reported periods are positive.

  • Dirac equation and stated near-edge dispersion have different quadratic coefficients

    Minor

    The dispersion of Eq. (6) has a term c eff1 squared times the squared momentum, whereas the stated near-edge dispersion has c eff1 times c eff2. These differ for the unequal couplings under discussion.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 31 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Zhan, K., Chen, Q., Zhang, Q., Zhao, T., Qin, H., He, H., & Yao, G.
Affiliations
China University of Petroleum, East China (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhan, Kaiyun
Venue
Nanophotonics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-09-05
Volume
13
Issue
23
Pages
4267-4273
ISSN
  • 2192-8606 (ISSN-L)
  • 2192-8614
OpenAlex
W4402228449
Cited by
3
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nanophotonics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61605251)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (22CX03028A)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2021MA030)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Nonlinear Photonic Systems
Keywords
helical waveguide, photonic superlattices, effective coupling strength, topological photonics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review