CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceInternational Relations and Foreign Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Chinese State and Overseas NGOs: From Regulatory Ambiguity to the Overseas NGO Law

Open access
Shieh, Shawn·2018·Nonprofit Policy Forum
DOI 10.1515/npf-2017-0034
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This article discusses the significance of the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Administration of Activities of Overseas Nongovernmental Organizations in the Mainland of China (hereafter the ONGO Law) for the Chinese state’s regulation of overseas NGOs in the reform period. We show how the ONGO Law represents a dramatic shift in the regulation of ONGOs from a situation of regulatory ambiguity to one where ONGOs now come under a comprehensive law that seeks to regulate all their activities in mainland China. In doing so, the Law has created a dramatic shift in the legitimacy of ONGOs in China. Before the Law was enacted, ONGOs operated in a legal grey area where their work was opaque, received little recognition, and enjoyed limited legitimacy in the eyes of the government and public. The Law will change all of that, making the work of ONGOs more visible and transparent, and providing a formal channel for dealing with the government. At the same time, in putting the implementation and enforcement of the Law in the hands of the Ministry of Public Security (MPS), and creating a legal framework that is restrictive rather than enabling, the Chinese state has sent a very different and contradictory message to ONGOs who see themselves being viewed more as objects of suspicion than as legitimate stakeholders in China’s development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/npf-2017-0034

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Deng, Guosheng. 2010. “The Hidden Rules Governing China’s Unregistered NGOs: Management and Consequences.” The China Review 10 (1) (Spring): 183–206.
  2. Huang, Mu. 2012. “Hard to Lend a Helping Hand: The Obstacles in Registration and Operation of International Nongovernmental Organizations in China.” The George Washington International Law Review 44 (4): 1–26.
  3. Salamon, Lester, and S. Sokolowski. 2004. Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector, Vol. 2. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 20

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Shieh, S.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Shieh, Shawn
Venue
Nonprofit Policy Forum
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Published
2018-01-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2154-3348 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-6035
DOI
10.1515/npf-2017-0034
OpenAlex
W2802201281
Cited by
20
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Nonprofit Policy Forum (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
Keywords
Chinese state, regulatory ambiguity, NGO legitimacy, Ministry of Public Security, legal framework, reform period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review