VEG-01: Veggie Hardware Validation Testing on the International Space Station
Open accessAbstract
The Veggie vegetable production system was launched to the International Space Station with three sets of test plants for an initial hardware validation test, designated VEG-01. VEG-01A and B featured the crop ‘Outredgeous’ red romaine lettuce, while VEG-01C tested ‘Profusion’ zinnia plants for longer duration growth and flowering characteristics. Irrigation of plants in all three growth studies presented a challenge, with lettuce suffering from inadequate water and zinnia suffering from excess water. Direct plant pillow watering by crew members enabled plant growth, and returned samples from the first crop, VEG-01A, indicated that food safety was acceptable. VEG-01B plants at harvest were split to allow for on-orbit crew consumption as well as science sample return. Direct-watered zinnias suffered fungal growth and other physiological stresses, but two plants survived and these produced numerous flowers. The VEG-01 series allowed a large amount of data on system performance, human factors, procedures, microbiology, and chemistry of space-grown plants to be gathered. Observations from these tests are helping to drive future hardware modifications and provide information on food crop growth and development in a microgravity environment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Plants can be incorporated into the ECLSS, which have benefits: produce green food and O2, reduce CO2, and provide psychological profits to alleviate the loneliness of crew.
“In addition to the above subsystems, plants can be also incorporated into the ECLSS, which have several benefits: (1) produce green food and O2; (2) reduce CO2; (3) provide psychological profits to alleviate the loneliness of crew. 45”
From Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review (2024) · cites this paper as [45]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 123
- Authors
- Massa, G. D., Dufour, N. F., Carver, J. A., Hummerick, M. E., Wheeler, R. M., Morrow, R. C., & Smith, T. M.
- Affiliations
- Kennedy Space Center (US)
- ORBITEC , Madison , WI, United States of America
- Corresponding author
- Massa, Gioia D.
- Venue
- Open Agriculture
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2017-02-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-41
- ISSN
- 2391-9531 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2588188498
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7
- FWCI
- 5.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Open Agriculture (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
- Keywords
- International Space Station, Zinnia, plant irrigation, food safety, fungal growth, plant microbiology, hardware modification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review