CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

From 3D Scans to Networks: Using Swords to Understand Communities of Central European Bronze Age Smiths

Golubiewski-Davis, Kristina·2018·Open Archaeology
DOI 10.1515/opar-2018-0008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This case study uses 3D scans of Central European Bronze Age swords (~1400-800BC) to recreate community networks of knowledge. 3D scans of 111 bronze swords were analyzed, from which measurements including blade profile, hilt profile, and decorative shape data were collected. The data were analyzed using a variety of statistical methods. Cluster analysis was used to create links between the nodes of networks that were modelled. A community detection algorithm was run on the networks to examine potential communities of bronze smiths based on theorized manufacturing decisions. These analyses suggest there were four distinct areas within which craft workers were sharing knowledge.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/opar-2018-0008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Laux, 2009, Die Schwerter in Niedersachsen Prähistorische Bronzefunde IV Band Stuttgart Verlag Elements for an Anthropology of Technology University of Michigan of Anthropology, Ann Arbor Museum, 17
  2. Kristiansen, 2011, Constructing Social and Cultural Identities in the Bronze In Investigating Archaeological Material Culture Variability Transmission, Age Cultures, 201
  3. Kristiansen, 1998, Europe Before University, History
  4. Dietler, 1998, Habitus Techniques An Integrated Approach to the Social Understanding of Material Culture and Boundaries In The Archaeology of Social Boundaries Institution, Style Smithsonian, 232
  5. Kuijpers, 2017, The Bronze Age a World of Specialists ? Metalworking from the Perspective of Skill and Material Specialization European of org, Journal Archaeology, 1, 10.1017/eaa.2017.59 · DOI
  6. Ioviţă, 2009, scaling lithic method application of, systematics Journal Archaeological Science, 1447, 10.1016/j.jas.2009.02.008 · DOI
  7. Cary, 2016, SAS Institute SAS User Guide SAS Institute, STAT, 14
  8. Stark, 1998, Technical Choices and Social Boundaries in Material Culture Patterning : An Introduction In The Archaeology of Social Boundaries Institution, Smithsonian, 1
  9. Blake, 2014, and Regional Identity in Bronze Age Italy University, Social Networks
  10. Knappett, 2013, a Network in New Approaches to Regional Interaction University, Analysis Archaeology, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697090.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Dallal, 2012, The Little Handbook of Statistical Practice Version edition, 1
  12. Sorensen, 2005, Interpreting the body : burial practices at the Middle Bronze Age cemetery at, Archaeologia, 89
  13. Knappett, 2013, Introduction Why In Network in New Approaches to Regional Interaction University, Networks Analysis Archaeology, 201
  14. Carr, 1995, Person Archaeological Ethnological Perspectives New York Plenum, Style Society, 10.1007/978-1-4899-1097-4 · DOI
  15. Farbstein, 2011, Technologies of art critical reassessment of Pavlovian art and using chaîne opératoire method and theory Current, society Archaeology, 52, 401
  16. Blondel, 2008, Fast unfolding of community hierarchies in large networks of and, Journal Statistical Mechanics Theory Experiment, 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/10008 · DOI
  17. Holland, 2008, Principal components analysis Department of University of Athens, Geology Georgia
  18. Neaher, 1979, who travel itinerant metalsmiths of southern Nigeria, Africa, 49, 352, 10.2307/1159223 · DOI
  19. Coles, 2000, Patterns in a Rocky Land Rock Carvings in South - West Uppsala Department of Ancient Uppsala University, Archaeology History
  20. Craddock, 1995, Early Metal Mining and Production Institution, Smithsonian
  21. Wells, 1989, Intensification Entrepreneurship and Cognitive Change in the Bronze - Iron Age transition In The Bronze Age - Iron Age Transition in Europe BAR International Series i Archaeological Reports, British, 483
  22. CartoDB, 2016, Location Software Location Software Accessed, Intelligence Intelligence, 20
  23. Golubiewski, 2016, Supplementary Data for Reconstructing Past Craft Network case study using scans of Late Bronze Age swords to reconstruct specialized craft networks Dissertation Data Repository for U of http dx doi org, 10.13020/D6PK5 · DOI
  24. Rowlands, 1971, The archaeological interpretation of prehistoric metalworking, World Archaeology, 20, 210, 10.1080/00438243.1969.9979502 · DOI
  25. Barabási, 2014, Linked How everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business everyday life New York Basic Books, science
  26. Molloy, 2017, Hunting Warriors : The Transformation of Weapons Combat Practices and Society during the Bronze Age in European of org, Journal Archaeology, 20, 280, 10.1017/eaa.2016.8 · DOI
  27. Iwata, 2002, SHAPE computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors of, Journal Heredity, 384, 10.1093/jhered/93.5.384 · DOI
  28. Kristiansen, 2002, The tale of the sword - swords and swordfighters in Bronze Age Europe of, Oxford Journal Archaeology, 21, 319, 10.1111/1468-0092.00166 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Terrell, 2013, Social Network Analysis and the Practice of In Network Analysis in New Approaches to Regional Interaction Oxford Scholarship, History Archaeology Online, 201, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697090.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Brughmans, 2013, Thinking Through of Formal Network in of Archaeological Method Theory, Networks Review Methods Archaeology Journal, 20, 623, 10.1007/s10816-012-9133-8 · DOI
  31. Bastian, 2009, an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, International
  32. Mödlinger, 2009, Manufacture and Use of Bronze Age Swords Multidisciplinary Investigation of Austrian Metal Hilted and Organic Hilted nd International Conference Archaeometallurgy in Europe Selected Italy Italiana di, Papers Metallurgia, 191
  33. Mills, 2017, Social Network in of, Analysis Archaeology Annual Review Anthropology, 379, 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041423 · DOI
  34. Kuhl, 1982, Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour and Processing, Computer Graphics Image, 18, 236, 10.1016/0146-664X(82)90034-X · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Golubiewski-Davis, K.
Venue
Open Archaeology
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Published
2018-04-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
123-144
ISSN
2300-6560
DOI
10.1515/opar-2018-0008
Cited by
4
References
0
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review