Cited by 0Geotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchMaterials Engineering and Processing

Multi-source industrial waste-based binder for marine soft clay: mechanical performance and microstructural mechanisms

Open access
Qiu, Chengzhu, Tian, Shuai, Fang, Ning, Hao, Dongxue·2026·REVIEWS ON ADVANCED MATERIALS SCIENCE

Abstract

Marine soft clays, characterized by high compressibility, low shear strength, and water sensitivity, pose significant challenges for the construction of coastal infrastructure. This study develops and evaluates an alkali-free, Ca-based alkali-activated binder (GFPC) composed of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), fly ash (FA), phosphogypsum (PG), and calcium carbide slag (CCS), all derived from industrial by-products. A D-optimal mixture design was employed to optimize component proportions and assess synergistic effects on mechanical performance. Unconfined compressive strength tests at various curing ages and after 20 freeze–thaw cycles, combined with XRD and SEM–EDS analyses, were conducted to evaluate strength development, durability, and microstructural evolution. The optimal mix (68.4 % GGBS, 10 % FA, 11.6 % PG, 10 % CCS) achieved a 28-day UCS of 4.24 MPa, which is 36.8 % higher than that of cement-stabilized soil, and retained 2.41 MPa after 20 freeze–thaw cycles, 52.5 % higher than the corresponding value for cement stabilization. Strength loss was most pronounced during the first five cycles (38.44 %) and then stabilized. Microstructural analyses revealed abundant C-(A)-S-H gels and ettringite filling pores and densifying the soil skeleton. Environmental and economic assessments indicated 97.8 % lower carbon emissions and a 67.5 % lower unit strength cost compared with cement stabilization. These results demonstrate that the proposed alkali-free GFPC binder, derived from multiple industrial waste streams, provides a high-performance, low-carbon, and cost-effective alternative for marine soft clay stabilization, supporting more sustainable and resilient coastal infrastructure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/rams-2025-0263

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37

Authors
Qiu, C., Tian, S., Fang, N., & Hao, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology Liaoning (CN)
  • Shandong University (CN)
  • Northeast Electric Power University (CN)
Venue
REVIEWS ON ADVANCED MATERIALS SCIENCE
Published
2026-01-01
Volume
65
Issue
1
ISSN
1605-8127 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7172270825
Cited by
0
References
37
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • REVIEWS ON ADVANCED MATERIALS SCIENCE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Materials Engineering and Processing
Keywords
alkali-activated binders, ground granulated blast furnace slag, fly ash, phosphogypsum, carbide slag, industrial waste utilization, unconfined compressive strength, freeze-thaw resistance, C-A-S-H gel, ettringite, microstructure, carbon emission reduction, coastal infrastructure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review