Cited by 95Contact Dermatitis and AllergiesDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsHeavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity

Copper Hypersensitivity: Dermatologie Aspects

Hostynek, Jurij J., Maibach, Howard I.·2003·Reviews on Environmental Health

Abstract

Reports of immune hypersensitivity reactions of both the immediate and the delayed type following cutaneous or systemic exposure to copper are reviewed here in an endeavor to draw a comprehensive profile of the immunogenic potential of that metal and its compounds. The immunotoxic potential of the metal is also briefly reviewed. In principle, as noted for other transition metals, the electropositive copper ion is potentially immunogenic because of its ability to diffuse through biological membranes, forming complexes when in contact with tissue protein. Based on the results of the predictive guinea pig test and the local lymph node assay (LLNA), copper has a low sensitization potential. Reports of immune reactions to copper include immunologic contact urticaria (ICU), allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), systemic allergic reactions (SAR) and contact stomatitis (STO), but considering the widespread use of copper intrauterine devices (IUDs) and the importance of copper in coinage, items of personal adornment and industry, unambiguous reports of sensitization to the metal are extremely rare, and even fewer are the cases that appear clinically relevant. Most reports of immune reactions to copper describe systemic exposure as a cause--predominantly to intrauterine devices and to prosthetic materials in dentistry--implicitly excluding the induction of hypersensitivity from contact with the skin as a risk factor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/reveh.2003.18.3.153

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In comparison with other metal compounds, copper has a low allergenic potential, and the risk of adverse side effects due to skin contact with the metal is small.

    “In comparison with other metal compounds, copper has a low allergenic potential, and the risk of adverse side effects due to skin contact with the metal is small [132,133].”

    From Bioactive Compounds for Skin Health: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as [132]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 92 · Cited by 95

Authors
Hostynek, J. J., & Maibach, H. I.
Venue
Reviews on Environmental Health
Published
2003-01
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
153-83
ISSN
  • 0048-7554 (ISSN-L)
  • 2191-0308
OpenAlex
W1818175667
Cited by
95
References
92
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reviews on Environmental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
International Copper Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Keywords
metal allergy, immediate hypersensitivity, delayed-type hypersensitivity, immunotoxicity, allergic contact dermatitis, contact stomatitis, systemic allergic reactions, intrauterine devices, prosthetic materials, local lymph node assay, guinea pig test, transition metals
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Assay, Copper, Guinea Pigs, Humans, Intrauterine Devices, Lymph Nodes, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Stomatitis, Urticaria, Occupational Exposure, Dental Prosthesis, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review