Impaired allocentric spatial memory underlying topographical disorientation
Abstract
The cognitive processes supporting spatial navigation are considered in the context of a patient (CF) with possible very early Alzheimer's disease who presents with topographical disorientation. Her verbal memory and her recognition memory for unknown buildings, landmarks and outdoor scenes was intact, although she showed an impairment in face processing. By contrast, her navigational ability, quantitatively assessed within a small virtual reality (VR) town, was significantly impaired. Interestingly, she showed a selective impairment in a VR object-location memory test whenever her viewpoint was shifted between presentation and test, but not when tested from the same viewpoint. We suggest that a specific impairment in locating objects relative to the environment rather than relative to the perceived viewpoint (i.e. allocentric rather than egocentric spatial memory) underlies her topographical disorientation. We discuss the likely neural bases of this deficit in the light of related studies in humans and animals, focusing on the hippocampus and related areas. The specificity of our test indicates a new way of assessing topographical disorientation, with possible application to the assessment of progressive dementias such as Alzheimer's disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The most specific domains for VR diagnostic and training purposes in AD patients include attention, executive functions, memory, orientation, and ADL.
“The most specific domains for VR diagnostic and training purposes in AD patients include attention (322), executive functions (323–326), memory (327–333), orientation (322, 327, 334–336), and ADL (337, 338).”
From The Multidisciplinary Approach to Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia. A Narrative Review of Non-Pharmacological Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [327]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 75
- Authors
- Burgess, N., Trinkler, I., King, J., Kennedy, A., & Cipolotti, L.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Venue
- Reviews in the Neurosciences
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 239-51
- ISSN
- 0334-1763 (ISSN-L)
- 2191-0200
- OpenAlex
- W2000234496
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 10.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Reviews in the Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- topographical disorientation, allocentric spatial memory, spatial navigation, Alzheimer's disease, virtual reality navigation, object location memory, perspective shift, hippocampus, face processing, dementia assessment
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Disability Evaluation, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Memory, Memory Disorders, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Neuropsychological Tests, Orientation, Space Perception, Verbal Behavior, Disease Progression, Early Diagnosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review