Cited by 1,349Linguistic research and analysisDiscourse Analysis in Language StudiesSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

The idiom principle and the open choice principle

ERMAN, BRITT, WARREN, BEATRICE·2000·Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse

Abstract

The assumptions forming the basis of this study are that the language user has available a number of more-or-less preconstructed phrases and that the production of texts involves alternation between word-for-word combinations—which we refer to as adherence to the open choice principle (after Sinclair 1991)—and preconstructed multi-word combinations, which we refer to as making use of the idiom principle (again after Sinclair). The main aim of the study is to gain an Impression ofthe impact that this alternation has on the structure of texts. Therefore a mode of analysis has been worked out revealing how multi-word combinations combine with each other and with words combined according to the open choice principle. This is the main contribution of the study. Another important contribution is the revelation that there is a large amount of prefabricated language in bot h spoken and written texts (on average around half of the texts), which makes it impossible to consider idioms and other multi-word combinations as marginal phenomena.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.29

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 22 · Cited by 1,349

Authors
ERMAN, B., & WARREN, B.
Venue
Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse
Published
2000
Volume
20
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0165-4888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-4117
OpenAlex
W2166522237
Cited by
1,349
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 109 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 140 · 2015: 104 · 2014: 120 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 130
FWCI
52.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Text and Talk (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistic research and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
idiom principle, text structure, phraseology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review