The idiom principle and the open choice principle
Abstract
The assumptions forming the basis of this study are that the language user has available a number of more-or-less preconstructed phrases and that the production of texts involves alternation between word-for-word combinations—which we refer to as adherence to the open choice principle (after Sinclair 1991)—and preconstructed multi-word combinations, which we refer to as making use of the idiom principle (again after Sinclair). The main aim of the study is to gain an Impression ofthe impact that this alternation has on the structure of texts. Therefore a mode of analysis has been worked out revealing how multi-word combinations combine with each other and with words combined according to the open choice principle. This is the main contribution of the study. Another important contribution is the revelation that there is a large amount of prefabricated language in bot h spoken and written texts (on average around half of the texts), which makes it impossible to consider idioms and other multi-word combinations as marginal phenomena.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Formulaic language is more common in speech than in writing.
“Formulaic language is more common in speech than in writing (Erman & Warren, 2000)”
From Effects of Availability, Contingency, and Formulaicity on the Accuracy of English Grammatical Morphemes in Second Language Writing (2022) · cites this paper as Erman & Warren, 2000
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 22 · Cited by 1,349
- Authors
- ERMAN, B., & WARREN, B.
- Venue
- Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0165-4888 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-4117
- OpenAlex
- W2166522237
- Cited by
- 1,349
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 48 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 109 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 140 · 2015: 104 · 2014: 120 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 130
- FWCI
- 52.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Text and Talk (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistic research and analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- idiom principle, text structure, phraseology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review