The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we bring to the attention of the linguistic community recent research on heritage languages. Shifting linguistic attention from the model of a monolingual speaker to the model of a multilingual speaker is important for the advancement of our understanding of the language faculty. Native speaker competence is typically the result of normal first language acquisition in an environment where the native language is dominant in various contexts, and learners have extensive and continuous exposure to it and opportunities to use it. Heritage speakers present a different case: they are bilingual speakers of an ethnic or immigrant minority language, whose first language often does not reach native-like attainment in adulthood. We propose a set of connections between heritage language studies and theory construction, underscoring the potential that this population offers for linguistic research. We examine several important grammatical phenomena from the standpoint of their representation in heritage languages, including case, aspect, and other interface phenomena. We discuss how the questions raised by data from heritage speakers could fruitfully shed light on current debates about how language works and how it is acquired under different conditions. We end with a consideration of the potential competing factors that shape a heritage language system in adulthood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80022-3 · Cited by 2,801
L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1177/026765839601200103 · Cited by 1,743 · cited 1×
“…of a second language in different levels of linguistic analysis (phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, lexicon) have been extensively documented in the second language acquisition literature over the years (Odlin 1989; White 1989; Gass & Selinker 1992; Schwartz & Sprouse 1996; Jarvis 1998).”
BackgroundMaturational constraints on language learning
Newport, E. L. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1401_2 · Cited by 1,738
Early speech perception and later language development: implications for the “critical period”
Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Padden, D., Nelson, T., & Pruitt, J. (2005) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2005.9671948 · Cited by 482
Structure Dependence in Grammar Formation
Crain, S., & Nakayama, M. (1987) · Language · doi:10.2307/415004 · Cited by 402 · cited 1×
“The same applies to errors of all types, which is why utterances like (5) never occur (Crain & Nakayama 1987, Legate & Yang 2002): (7) *Is the woman who singing is happy?”
BackgroundCritical periods in language acquisition and language attrition
Pallier, C. (2007) · Studies in Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/sibil.33.11pal · Cited by 99
Cited by
The Acquisition of Heritage Languages
Montrul, S. (2015) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139030502 · Cited by 900
Self-citationKupisch, T., & Rothman, J. (2018) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/1367006916654355 · Cited by 309
Pedagogical translanguaging in community/heritage Arabic language learning
Abourehab, Y., & Azaz, M. (2023) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2020.1826496 · Cited by 40
Callen, M. C. (2025) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728924000555 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M.
- Venue
- Theoretical Linguistics
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2013-01-20
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3-4
- ISSN
- 0301-4428 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-4060
- OpenAlex
- W2132135688
- Cited by
- 758
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 38.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.