CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 33Biblical Studies and InterpretationAncient Egypt and ArchaeologyLanguage, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Joseph, Judah and the Benjamin Conundrum

Levin, Yigal·2004·Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft
DOI 10.1515/zatw.2004.011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/zatw.2004.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 33

Related

Metadata

Authors
Levin, Y.
Corresponding author
Levin, Yigal
ORCID
Levin, Yigal
Venue
Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Published
2004-01-16
Volume
116
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0044-2526 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-0103
DOI
10.1515/zatw.2004.011
OpenAlex
W2067235710
Semantic Scholar
f50272e5b9515adc34b014922ee1e621267f2b8d
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
Keywords
Joseph, Judah, Benjamin, Genesis, biblical narrative, patriarchal family

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review