The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Verwissenschaftlichung der Gesellschaft – Politisierung der Wissenschaft
Open accessAbstract
Zusammenfassung: Die Wissenschaftskritik richtet sich auf die Forschung selbst und wird in Form von Kontrollen institutionalisiert. Der Frage, ob sich damit ein neues Arrangement zwischen Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft ankündigt, wird anhand der Analyse zweier Prozesse nachgegangen: der Verwissenschaftlichung und damit der Delegitimierung gesellschaftlicher Werte und Institutionen und der gegenläufigen Politisierung von Wissenschaft. Die Wissenschaft scheint ethischen Bezügen nicht entrinnen zu können, auch dann nicht, wenn sie sie szientistisch zu begründen sucht. So bleibt der Konflikt unaufgelöst.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Via the creation processes of digital knowledge commons, the Open Access transformation of the scientific public sphere is thus leading in part to a ' scientification ' (Weingart 1983, own translation) of the democratic public sphere.”
From The structural transformation of the scientific public sphere: Constitution and consequences of the path towards open access (2024) · cites this paper as Weingart 1983
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Berg, R., et al., 1975: Asilomar Conference on Recom binant DNA Molecules. Science 188: 9 9 1 -9 9
- Cohen, I.B., 1980: The Fear and Distrust o f Science in Historical Perspective: Some First Thoughts. S. 2 9 -5 8 in: A.S. Markovits/K.W. Deutsch (Hrsg.), Fear o f Science -Trust in Science. Cambridge, Mass./Königstein, Ts..
- Etzioni, A., 1977: Die zweite Erschaffung des Men schen. Opladen. Frankfurter Rundschau, 1983: Nr. 42 (19.2.1983): 13. Gordon Research Conference, 1973: Science 181: 1114.
- Gray, B., 1978: Institutional Review Boards as an Ins trument o f Assessment: Research Involving Human Subjects in the US*. In: E. Mendelsohn/D. Nelkin/ P. Weingart (Hrsg.), The Social Assessment o f Science, Proceedings. Report 13. Bielefeld: For schungsschwerpunkt Wissenschaftsforschung.
- McDermott, W., 1967: Opening Comments on the Changing Mores o f Biomedical Research. Annals of Internal Medicine 7: 3 9 -4 2 ; abgedruckt in:
- Mendelsohn, E., 1978: Frankenstein at Harvard. The Public Politics o f Recombinant DNA Research. In: E. Mendelsohn/D. Nelkin/P. Weingart (Hrsg.), The Social Assessment o f Science, Proceedings. Report 13. Bielefeld: Forschungsschwerpunkt Wis senschaftsforschung.
- Nelkin, D., 1978a: Value Conflict and Modes o f Inter vention in Biomedical Research. In: E. Mendel sohn/D. Nelkin/P. Weingart (Hrsg.), The Social As sessment o f Science, Proceedings. Report 13. Biele feld: Forschungsschwerpunkt Wissenschaftsfor schung.
- Nelkin, D., 1978b: Threats and Promises. Negotiating the Control o f Research. Daedalus 107, 2: 1 9 1 -2 1 0 . Presse und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung, 1977: Bulletin Nr. 91 vom 23.9.1977: 839.
- Reiser, S.J., 1978: Human Experimentation and the Convergence o f Medical Research and Patient Care. Annals, AAPSS 437: 8 -1 8 .
- Wilson, E.O., 1980: Sociobiology. Abridged Edn. Cambridge.
Cited by
Dobusch, L., & Heimstädt, M. (2024) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/01914537231203558 · Cited by 8
“Via the creation processes of digital knowledge commons, the Open Access transformation of the scienti fi c public sphere is thus leading in part to a ‘ scienti fi cation ’ (Weingart 1983, own translation) of the democratic public sphere.”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Weingart, P.
- Affiliations
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Weingart, Peter
- ORCID
- Weingart, Peter
- Venue
- Zeitschrift für Soziologie
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1983-06-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 225-241
- ISSN
- 0340-1804 (ISSN-L)
- 2366-0325
- OpenAlex
- W21036233
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Zeitschrift für Soziologie (publishedVersion)
- PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
- Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Science and Policy Research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education, Politics, and Culture Studies
- Keywords
- politicization of science, science and society, critique of science, scientific ethics, scientism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
