Cited by 107Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesFungal Plant Pathogen Control

New generation azole antifungals in clinical investigation

Girmenia, Corrado·2009·Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs

Abstract

Considerable progress in treating systemic mycoses has been achieved in the past years through development of new drugs in association with more advanced diagnostic procedures. Here, we review the pharmacological, microbiological and clinical development progress with the so-called 'second generation' triazoles: voriconazole, posaconazole, ravuconazole, isavuconazole and albaconazole. All these drugs exhibit a favourable pharmacokinetic and toxicity profile and possess high activity against resistant and emerging pathogens. However, only voriconazole and posaconazole have been adequately investigated in Phase III studies and have been approved by the regulatory agencies in the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections, respectively. On the contrary, ravuconazole, isavuconazole and albaconazole have not been investigated in adequate clinical trials and, in the absence of proper data, the real possibilities of these agents as competitors for the treatment and prevention of invasive mycoses in the clinical setting are still unknown. The drug interactions and the variability in the absorption and/or metabolism of the triazoles, in particular voriconazole and posaconazole, may determine an unpredictable exposure of the pathogens to the antifungal treatments. Literature evidences strongly support the use of therapeutic drug monitoring for these triazoles which may be crucial for the proper management of severe invasive fungal infections.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/13543780903176407

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 92 · Cited by 107

Authors
Girmenia, C.
Affiliations
Policlinico Umberto I (IT)
Corresponding author
Girmenia, Corrado
Venue
Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
Published
2009-08-14
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
1279-1295
ISSN
  • 1354-3784 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7658
OpenAlex
W2086271708
Cited by
107
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
azole antifungals, voriconazole, posaconazole, ravuconazole, isavuconazole, invasive fungal infections, systemic fungal infection, antifungal resistance, emerging fungal pathogens, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, antifungal prophylaxis, pharmacokinetics, toxicity
MeSH terms
Animals, Antifungal Agents, Aspergillus, Azoles, Candida, Clinical Trials as Topic, Cryptococcus neoformans, Drug Interactions, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mycoses, Drug Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review