Cited by 74Nitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionNeurological Disorders and Treatments

Nitric oxide donor drugs: an update on pathophysiology and therapeutic potential

Scatena, Roberto, Bottoni, Patrizia, Martorana, Giuseppe E, Giardina, Bruno·2005·Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs

Abstract

The discovery of the multiple physiological and pathophysiological processes in which nitric oxide (NO) is involved has promoted a great number of pharmacological researches to develop new drugs that are capable of influencing NO production directly and/or indirectly for therapeutic purposes (i.e, NO-releasing drugs, NO-inhibiting drugs, and phosphodiesterase V inhibitors). In particular, the so-called NO donor drugs could actually have an important therapeutic effect in the treatment of many diseases such as arteriopathies (atherosclerosis and its sequelae, arterial hypertension and some forms of male sexual impotence), various acute and chronic inflammatory conditions (colitis, rheumatoid arthritis and tissue remodelling), and several degenerative diseases (Alzheimer's disease and cancer). The old organic nitrates show some well-known pitfalls including the induction of tolerance and acute side effects related to abrupt vasodilation such as cephalea and hypotension, which limit their therapeutic indications. A low therapeutic index (i.e., peroxynitrite toxicity) has always characterised the sydnonimines class. A series of interesting new classes of NO donors are under intense pharmacological investigation and scrutiny (S-nitrosothiols, diazeniumdiolates and NO hybrid drugs), each characterised by a particular pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. The most important obstacle in the field of NO donor drugs is represented by the difficulty in targeting NO release, and thereby its effects, to a particular tissue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/13543784.14.7.835

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 106 · Cited by 74

Authors
Scatena, R., Bottoni, P., Martorana, G. E., & Giardina, B.
Affiliations
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Venue
Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
Published
2005-07
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
835-846
ISSN
  • 1354-3784 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7658
OpenAlex
W1969488665
Cited by
74
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
nitric oxide donors, nitric oxide, organic nitrates, tolerance (pharmacology and immunology), sydnonimines, S-nitrosothiols, diazeniumdiolates, atherosclerosis, hypertension, erectile dysfunction, inflammation, Alzheimer's disease, cancer, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Nitric Oxide, Nitric Oxide Donors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review