Treatment of central precocious puberty
Abstract
The problems of central precocious puberty (CPP) are serious enough to the patient to deserve treatment. There is a general consensus among paediatric endocrinologists that the treatment of true CPP (i.e., in children young enough to have a formal diagnosis) is indicated in many cases. In children with modestly early puberty who are not fulfilling the diagnostic criteria, this is not the case. The treatment of choice is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue. Prolonged analogues are more effective than short-acting ones and, most importantly, independent of patient compliance. Data on agonists have accumulated over two decades and evidence of effects is rich in girls but sparse in boys. GnRH agonists are generally effective and safe drugs; the suppression of puberty is reversible and there is much information on GnRH agonists for the treatment of CPP showing very few adverse effects and the effects on final height are well documented in girls < 6 years of age. There is some (but not highly convincing) evidence for their effect on final height for those of 6 - 8 years of age and there is no evidence for an increase in final height after the age of 8 years in girls. If a decision to have treatment is taken, treatment should start immediately as a possible benefit is less probable if the start of treatment is delayed. When treatment should be stopped is a matter of controversy. Combination with growth hormone increases final height, but the clinical relevance can be di…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many GnRH agonists are safe and FDA-approved for treating precocious puberty in adolescents and reproductive cancers in adults.
“The use of many GnRHas has been proven to be safe and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in the early 1990s (1) for the treatment of precocious puberty in adolescents (2), and reproductive cancers in adults (3).”
From Puberty Blocker, Leuprolide, Reduces Sex Differences in Rough-and-Tumble Play and Anxiety-like Behavior in Juvenile Rats (2024) · cites this paper as [2]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hembree, W. C., Cohen-Kettenis, P. T., Gooren, L., Hannema, S. E., Meyer, W. J., Murad, M. H., Rosenthal, S. M., Safer, J. D., Tangpricha, V., & T’Sjoen, G. G. (2017) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2017-01658 · Cited by 2,328 · see citing works
Oliveira, G. D. F., Nguyen, A. T., Carreras-Simons, L., Niepsuj, T., Gadelhak, S. H., Johnson, A. K., Abdalla, A., Lev, E., Torres Román, S. G., Fuchs, S. N., et al. (2024) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/endocr/bqae046 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tuvemo, T.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Tuvemo, Torsten
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-04-24
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 495-505
- ISSN
- 1354-3784 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7658
- OpenAlex
- W2029732435
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- central precocious puberty, GnRH agonist, GnRH analogues, puberty suppression, adult height, treatment timing, treatment duration, adverse effects, pediatric endocrinology
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone, Puberty, Precocious, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review