Cited by 23Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments

Treatment of central precocious puberty

Tuvemo, Torsten·2006·Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs

Abstract

The problems of central precocious puberty (CPP) are serious enough to the patient to deserve treatment. There is a general consensus among paediatric endocrinologists that the treatment of true CPP (i.e., in children young enough to have a formal diagnosis) is indicated in many cases. In children with modestly early puberty who are not fulfilling the diagnostic criteria, this is not the case. The treatment of choice is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue. Prolonged analogues are more effective than short-acting ones and, most importantly, independent of patient compliance. Data on agonists have accumulated over two decades and evidence of effects is rich in girls but sparse in boys. GnRH agonists are generally effective and safe drugs; the suppression of puberty is reversible and there is much information on GnRH agonists for the treatment of CPP showing very few adverse effects and the effects on final height are well documented in girls < 6 years of age. There is some (but not highly convincing) evidence for their effect on final height for those of 6 - 8 years of age and there is no evidence for an increase in final height after the age of 8 years in girls. If a decision to have treatment is taken, treatment should start immediately as a possible benefit is less probable if the start of treatment is delayed. When treatment should be stopped is a matter of controversy. Combination with growth hormone increases final height, but the clinical relevance can be di…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/13543784.15.5.495

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tuvemo, T.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Tuvemo, Torsten
Venue
Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
Published
2006-04-24
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
495-505
ISSN
  • 1354-3784 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7658
OpenAlex
W2029732435
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
central precocious puberty, GnRH agonist, GnRH analogues, puberty suppression, adult height, treatment timing, treatment duration, adverse effects, pediatric endocrinology
MeSH terms
Humans, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone, Puberty, Precocious, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review