Cited by 39Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processes

Farnesyltransferase inhibitors: where are we now?

Tsimberidou, Apostolia Maria, Chandhasin, Chandtip, Kurzrock, Razelle·2010·Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs

Abstract

Importance of the field Farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs) target multiple pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of solid and hematologic malignancies. Areas covered in this review Novel preclinical and clinical data on FTIs. What the reader will gain Results of clinical trials of FTIs are critically summarized: Phase I - II studies demonstrated that tipifarnib (the most extensively investigated FTI) had antileukemic activity. The rates of complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and/or CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) in patients with MDS and refractory/poor-risk AML were 5 - 25% and 11 - 14%, respectively (hematological improvement, 17 - 35% and 8 - 9.5%, respectively). A Phase III study comparing tipifarnib with best supportive care, including hydroxyurea in patients with untreated AML ≥ 70 years old showed no survival benefit in the tipifarnib arm. A two-gene classifier (RASGRP1:APTX gene expression ratio) predicted response and survival, indicating that a two-gene expression assay may help select patients with AML who would benefit from tipifarnib. Take home message Patient selection should become a priority for targeted agent drug development. Clinical trials selecting patients who would benefit from FTIs should be designed to define the role of FTIs in the treatment of hematological malignancies and solid tumors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/13543784.2010.535516

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Therapies directed at interfering with Ras post-translational modifications gave poor clinical performance.

    “However, therapies directed at interfering with Ras post-translational modifications3 gave poor clinical performance”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsimberidou, A. M., Chandhasin, C., & Kurzrock, R.
Affiliations
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
Published
2010-12
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
1569-1580
ISSN
  • 1354-3784 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7658
OpenAlex
W2148570339
Cited by
39
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
Keywords
farnesyltransferase inhibitors, tipifarnib, acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, hematologic malignancies, solid tumors, patient selection, hydroxyurea, complete response, targeted therapy
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Clinical Trials as Topic, Enzyme Inhibitors, Humans, Neoplasms, Genes, ras, Quinolones, Farnesyltranstransferase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review