Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment of Acinetobacter infections

Michalopoulos, Argyris, Falagas, Matthew E·2010·Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: Acinetobacter baumannii has emerged as a major cause of healthcare-associated infections. It commonly presents resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents, occasionally including carbapenems and polymyxins, and hence, it is considered the paradigm of multidrug-resistant (MDR) or pandrug-resistant (PDR) bacterium. MDR A. baumannii is a rapidly emerging pathogen, especially in the intensive care setting, causing infections including bacteremia, pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), meningitis, urinary tract infection, central venous catheter-related infection, and wound infection. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: All potential antimicrobial agents that are available for the treatment of Acinetobacter infections are presented. Emphasis was given to the management of nosocomial infections due to MDR A. baumannii and its close relatives, spp. 3 and 13TU. Areas covered include bloodstream infections, pneumonia or VAP, meningitis, urinary tract infection, skin and soft-tissue or wound infections due to Acinetobacter. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: The antibiotics that are usually effective against A. baumannii infections include carbapenems, polymyxins E and B, sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, tigecycline and aminoglycosides. Carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem, doripenem) are the mainstay of treatment for A. baumannii, though carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter strains have increasingly been reported worldwide in recent years. However, although well-designed trials of new therapeutic approaches are certainly required, the most important factor necessary to guide clinicians in their choice of empirical or targeted therapy should be knowledge of the susceptibility patterns of strains present in their own geographical area. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Pooled data suggest that infections caused by A. baumannii, especially those with inappropriate treatment, are associated with considerable attributable mortality. The optimal treatment for A. baumannii nosocomial infections has not been established, especially for MDR strains. Therefore, well-designed clinical studies are necessary to guide clinicians on decisions regarding the best therapeutic approach for patients with MDR A. baumannii infections. In addition, new experimental studies are warranted to evaluate the activity and safety of peptides and other novel antibacterial agents for A. baumannii infections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/14656561003596350

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Michalopoulos, A., & Falagas, M. E.
Venue
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
Published
2010-03-09
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
779-788
ISSN
  • 1465-6566 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7666
OpenAlex
W2155451022
Cited by
180
References
2
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Acinetobacter infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1517/14656561003596350
The paper
Michalopoulos, A., & Falagas, M. E. (2010). Treatment of Acinetobacter infections. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1517/14656561003596350

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.