Chronic pain management issues in the primary care setting and the utility of long-acting opioids
Abstract
IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: Chronic/persistent pain - a highly prevalent condition that places a substantial burden on patients in terms of personal suffering, reduced productivity and health care costs - remains inadequately treated in many patients. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview and evaluate the burden and undertreatment of chronic/persistent pain, considerations for choosing an analgesic and the utility of long-acting opioids. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: A PubMed search was conducted to identify randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of long-acting opioids in chronic pain conditions. The following search terms were used: long-acting opioids, extended-release opioids, controlled-release opioids, sustained-release opioids, and transdermal opioids. The search was limited to randomized, controlled trials published within the last 10 years (1998 - 2008). Studies meeting the following criteria were excluded from review: those focused on a neuropathic pain condition or specific patient subpopulations (e.g., opioid-experienced patients); those conducted outside the USA; and those evaluating a long-acting opioid that is not on the US market at present. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: The reader will first develop a better understanding of the individual and societal ramifications of undertreated chronic pain. Then, a critical review of safety and efficacy data from well-controlled randomized studies will help readers understand the choices and variables that should be considered when selecting appropriate treatments for patients with chronic pain. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Successful management of chronic/persistent pain should be individually tailored to each patient, taking into account his or her pain intensity and duration, disease state, tolerance of adverse events and risk of medication abuse or diversion. The literature supports the efficacy and safety of a number of long-acting opioids for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic pain, demonstrating sustained improvements in pain intensity and pain-related sleep disturbances with these agents.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing research has focused on individually tailored programs.
“While it is encouraging that the existing research has focused on individually tailored programs given that research has shown the importance of tailored treatment plans in the successful management of chronic pain, future studies should investigate the efficacy of tailored treatment plans on a larger cohort for increased validity and reliability [69].”
From Psychological interventions for individuals with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorder: a scoping review (2023) · cites this paper as [69]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 17
- Authors
- Zorba Paster, R.
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
- Publisher
- Informa Healthcare
- Published
- 2010-07-15
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1823-1833
- ISSN
- 1465-6566 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7666
- OpenAlex
- W2102796352
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Keywords
- chronic pain, long-acting opioids, extended-release opioids, controlled-release opioids, sustained-release opioids, transdermal opioids, undertreatment of pain, analgesic selection, pain intensity, sleep disorders, primary care
- MeSH terms
- Analgesics, Opioid, Chronic Disease, Humans, Pain, Primary Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review