Cited by 116Chemokine receptors and signalingNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsInflammation biomarkers and pathways

Fractalkine/CX3CR1: why a single chemokine-receptor duo bears a major and unique therapeutic potential

D'Haese, Jan G, Demir, Ihsan Ekin, Friess, Helmut, Ceyhan, Güralp O·2010·Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets

Abstract

Importance of the field Fractalkine, also known as CX3CL1, is the unique member of the fourth class of chemokines and mediates both chemotaxis and adhesion of inflammatory cells via its highly selective receptor CX3CR1. Fractalkine mediates inflammatory responses and pain sensation and is involved in the pathogenesis and progression of numerous inflammatory disorders and malignancies. Areas covered in this review We performed a Medline/PubMed search to detect all published studies that explored the role of fractalkine and CX3CR1 and the possibilities of therapeutic intervention in the fractalkine/CX3CR1 axis in a wide range of clinical disorders, using CX3CR1 blocking antibodies, different fractalkine antagonists, CX3CR1 depletion or transfection of fractalkine expression vectors. What the reader will gain This review summarizes the role of fractalkine and its receptor CX3CR1 in various diseases, focusing on their high potential as novel therapeutic targets, with special emphasis on pancreatic diseases. Take home message The reviewed studies provide promising results demonstrating fractalkine and CX3CR1 as potential target molecules for future therapeutics that may attenuate pain, inflammation and furthermore serve as an anti-cancer therapy. However, to date, no therapeutics targeting fractalkine or CX3CR1 are in clinical use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/14728220903540265

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CX3CR1 and its ligand fractalkine have been implicated in recruitment of mononuclear phagocytes to sites of inflammation and injury and play roles in the pathogenesis of several inflammatory conditions including atherosclerosis, neuropathic pain, and asthma.

    “CX3CR1 and its chemokine ligand fractalkine (CX3CL1) have been implicated in the recruitment of mononuclear phagocytes to sites of inflammation and injury (7, 10, 11) and play roles in the pathogenesis of several inflammatory conditions, including atherosclerosis (12, 13), neuropathic pain (14), and asthma (15).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 97 · Cited by 116

Authors
D'Haese, J. G., Demir, I. E., Friess, H., & Ceyhan, G. O.
Affiliations
TUM Klinikum (DE)
Venue
Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets
Published
2010-01-08
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
207-219
ISSN
  • 1472-8222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7631
OpenAlex
W1975662731
Cited by
116
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Inflammation biomarkers and pathways
Keywords
fractalkine, CX3CR1, inflammatory diseases, pain, cancer therapy, pancreatic diseases, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Inflammation, Neoplasms, Pain, Pancreatic Diseases, Chemokine CX3CL1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review