Cannabinoid receptor systems: therapeutic targets for tumour intervention.
Abstract
The past decade has witnessed a rapid expansion of our understanding of the biological roles of cannabinoids and their cognate receptors. It is now certain that Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the principle psychoactive component of the Cannabis sativa plant, binds and activates membrane receptors of the 7-transmembrane domain, G-protein-coupled superfamily. Several putative endocannabinoids have since been identified, including anandamide, 2-arachidonyl glycerol and noladin ether. Synthesis of numerous cannabinomimetics has also greatly expanded the repertoire of cannabinoid receptor ligands with the pharmacodynamic properties of agonists, antagonists and inverse agonists. Collectively, these ligands have proven to be powerful tools both for the molecular characterisation of cannabinoid receptors and the delineation of their intrinsic signalling pathways. Much of our understanding of the signalling mechanisms activated by cannabinoids is derived from studies of receptors expressed by tumour cells; hence, this review provides a succinct summary of the molecular pharmacology of cannabinoid receptors and their roles in tumour cell biology. Moreover, there is now a genuine expectation that the manipulation of cannabinoid receptor systems may have therapeutic potential for a diverse range of human diseases. Thus, this review also summarises the demonstrated antitumour actions of cannabinoids and indicates possible avenues for the future development of cannabinoids as antitumour agents.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evidence is accumulating for endocannabinoid involvement in conditions involving growth of pathological tissue or tissue transplantation.
“Indeed, evidence is accumulating for endocannabinoid involvement in some of these conditions [15,24,40]”
From Endocannabinoid involvement in endometriosis. (2010) · cites this paper as [24]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 93 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Jones, S., & Howl, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Wolverhampton (GB)
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 749-758
- ISSN
- 1472-8222 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7631
- OpenAlex
- W2046313672
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses (University of Wolverhampton) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
- Keywords
- cannabinoid receptors, G protein-coupled receptors, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, endocannabinoids, cannabinoid receptor ligands, anandamide, 2-arachidonoylglycerol
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Arachidonic Acids, Cannabinoids, Female, Humans, Male, Mammals, Models, Biological, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Neoplasm Proteins, Neoplasms, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Drug Design, Signal Transduction, Apoptosis, Receptors, Cannabinoid, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Polyunsaturated Alkamides, Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators, Endocannabinoids
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review