Efficacy, safety and clinical pharmacology of macitentan in comparison to other endothelin receptor antagonists in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Macitentan is a novel dual endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) showing sustained receptor occupancy. In vitro and in vivo animal studies have demonstrated its potency in antagonizing endothelin-induced disorders. A large morbidity/mortality study in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) taking macitentan has been completed recently. AREAS COVERED: This drug evaluation reviews the efficacy, safety and clinical pharmacology of macitentan in the treatment of PAH. EXPERT OPINION: The large Phase III study (SERAPHIN) tested macitentan in more than 700 PAH patients and has provided unique long-term outcome data for this ERA, not available for other members of this class. The effect on a composite clinically relevant morbidity/mortality end point was highly significant at a 10 mg/day dose. The safety profile of macitentan appears to be superior with respect to hepatic safety and edema/fluid retention than bosentan and ambrisentan, respectively, and is similar when considering decrease in hemoglobin concentration. The drug has a low propensity for drug-drug interactions and has one circulating pharmacologically active metabolite. The pharmacokinetics of macitentan in patients with renal or hepatic impairment does not require dose adjustments. Based on its characteristics, macitentan is an important addition to the therapeutic armamentarium in the long-term treatment of PAH. Its potential use in other disorders is under investigation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An increase in cognitive flexibility could help patients accept changes in their habits and maintain behaviors, with a possible long-term effect.
“An increase in cognitive flexibility could help patients accept changes in their habits and maintain behaviors, with a possible long-term effect (Dingemanse et al., 2013).”
From Common Predictive Factors of Social Media Addiction and Eating Disorder Symptoms in Female College Students: State Anxiety and the Mediating Role of Cognitive Flexibility/Sustained Attention (2022) · cites this paper as Dingemanse et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 106 · Cited by 75
- Authors
- Dingemanse, J., Sidharta, P. N., Maddrey, W. C., Rubin, L. J., & Mickail, H.
- Affiliations
- Actelion (Switzerland) (CH)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-11-22
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 391-405
- ISSN
- 1474-0338 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-764X
- OpenAlex
- W2085157020
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13
- FWCI
- 1.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Vascular Anomalies and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Apelin-related biomedical research
- Keywords
- macitentan, pulmonary arterial hypertension, endothelin receptor antagonists, hepatic safety, edema, hemoglobin decrease, drug-drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, renal dysfunction, liver dysfunction, bosentan, ambrisentan, drug metabolites
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Hypertension, Pulmonary, Pyrimidines, Sulfonamides, Endothelin Receptor Antagonists, Familial Primary Pulmonary Hypertension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review