The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Halogen bonding for rational drug design and new drug discovery
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A large number of drugs and drug candidates in clinical development contain halogen substituents. For a long time, only the steric and lipophilic contributions of halogens were considered when trying to exploit their effects on ligand binding. However, the ability of halogens to form stabilizing interactions, such as halogen bonding, hydrogen bonding and multipolar interactions, in biomolecular systems was revealed recently. Halogen bonding, the non-covalent interaction in which covalently bound halogens interact with Lewis bases, has now been utilized in the context of rational drug design. AREAS COVERED: The purpose of this review is to show how halogen bonding could be used in drug design, and in particular, to stimulate researchers to apply halogen bonding in lead optimization. This review article covers the recent advances relevant to halogen bonding in drug discovery and biological design over the past decade, including database survey of this interaction in protein-ligand complexes, molecular mechanical investigations of halogen bonding in drug discovery and applications of this interaction in the development of halogenated ligands as inhibitors and drugs for protein kinases, serine protease factor Xa, HIV reverse transcriptase and so on. EXPERT OPINION: Halogen bonding should intentionally be used as a powerful tool, comparable with hydrogen bonding, to enhance the binding affinity and also influence the binding selectivity. Rational design of new and potent inhibitors against therapeutic targets through halogen bonding continues to be an exciting area, which will be further elucidated with the combination of various experimental techniques and theoretical calculations in the forthcoming years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Bright Future of Unconventional σ/π‐Hole Interactions
Bauzá, A., Mooibroek, T. J., & Frontera, A. (2015) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201500314 · Cited by 710
Halogen Bond: Its Role beyond Drug–Target Binding Affinity for Drug Discovery and Development
Xu, Z., Yang, Z., Liu, Y., Lu, Y., Chen, K., & Zhu, W. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci400539q · Cited by 431
Self-citationAnion Transport with Chalcogen Bonds
Benz, S., Macchione, M., Verolet, Q., Mareda, J., Sakai, N., & Matile, S. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b05779 · Cited by 297
A quantum mechanics-based halogen bonding scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.
Yang, Z., Liu, Y., Chen, Z., Xu, Z., Shi, J., Chen, K., & Zhu, W. (2015) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-015-2681-6 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, Y., Liu, Y., Xu, Z., Li, H., Liu, H., & Zhu, W.
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-03-30
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 375-383
- ISSN
- 1746-0441 (ISSN-L)
- 1746-045X
- OpenAlex
- W2166845515
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Halogen bonding for rational drug design and new drug discovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1517/17460441.2012.678829
- The paper
- Lu, Y., Liu, Y., Xu, Z., Li, H., Liu, H., & Zhu, W. (2012). Halogen bonding for rational drug design and new drug discovery. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2012.678829
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.