Obstacles and future of gene therapy for hemophilia
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: The recent success of early-phase clinical trials for adeno-associated viral (AAV) liver-directed gene therapy for hemophilia B (HB) demonstrates the potential for gene therapy, in the future, to succeed protein-based prophylaxis therapy for HB. Significant obstacles, however, need to be overcome prior to widespread adoption. The largest obstacles include immune responses to the AAV capsid including preexisting neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and a delayed cellular immune response. Emerging evidence suggests that the latter is vector-dose dependent. Furthermore, the development and eradication of inhibitors remains a significant safety concern. Similarly, biological differences between Factor VIII and Factor IX (FIX) impose challenges to direct adoption of the successes for HB to hemophilia A (HA).Areas covered: The advantages and limitations of the current strategies addressing these obstacles for gene therapy for HB and HA are discussed, as well as vector manufacturing issues relevant to widespread adoption. Alternative strategies including both ex-vivo and in-vivo lentiviral-based methods are discussed, though we focus on AAV-based approaches because of their recent clinical success and potential.Expert opinion: Our opinion is that these obstacles can be overcome with current approaches, and AAV-based gene therapy for HB will likely translate into future clinical care. Innovative approaches are, however, likely needed to solve the current problems obstructing HA gene therapy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are considerable challenges in characterization testing, such as separating empty and full capsids.
“There are considerable challenges in characterization testing, such as separating empty and full capsids.153”
From Gene Therapy for Retinal Degenerative Diseases: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 106 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- Arruda, V. R., & Samelson-Jones, B. J.
- Affiliations
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Arruda, Valder R
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-07-18
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 997-1010
- ISSN
- 2167-8707 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4756761
- OpenAlex
- W1658726562
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL064190)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hemophilia Treatment and Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Keywords
- gene therapy, hemophilia B, hemophilia A, adeno-associated virus vectors, liver-directed gene therapy, neutralizing antibodies, cell-mediated immunity, factor IX inhibitors, factor VIII, lentiviral vectors, ex vivo gene therapy, vector manufacturing, clinical translation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review