The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Power Resources Approach: Developments and Challenges
Open accessAbstract
: In the discussion on trade union renewal, the power resources approach (PRA) has emerged as a research heuristic. The PRA is founded on the basic premise that organised labour can successfully defend its interests by collective mobilisation of power resources. This idea has significantly shaped the way scholars are dealing with the issue of union revitalisation and labour conflict, as studies from different world regions have examined union renewal as a process of utilising existing power resources while attempting to develop new ones. This editorial introduces the analytical tool of power resources by analysing its development and by presenting its basic tenets. In what follows, we will first describe the origins of the power resources approach. In the next section we will present a specific variety of the approach applied in this Special Issue. After that, we will discuss the relevance of the strategic context in applying the power resources approach by referring to the papers in this Special Issue, and finally we will discuss the mobilisation of labour power in societies in a state of fragile stability and in marginalised communities in developed countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Building on labour process and power resources theories (Schmalz et al., 2018), we argue that actors can use their knowledge as a power resource in the negotiations about the algorithmic management system.”
From Between control and participation: The politics of algorithmic management (2025) · cites this paper as Schmalz et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“Knowledge is a central power resource in these negotiation processes (Schmalz et al., 2018).”
From Between control and participation: The politics of algorithmic management (2025) · cites this paper as Schmalz et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anwar, M. A., & Graham, M. (2021) · Competition & Change · doi:10.1177/1024529420914473 · Cited by 429
Anwar, M. A., & Graham, M. (2020) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1177/0308518x19894584 · Cited by 350
Theorising labour unrest and trade unionism in the platform economy
Joyce, S., Stuart, M., & Forde, C. (2023) · New Technology, Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.12252 · Cited by 88
Between control and participation: The politics of algorithmic management
Krzywdzinski, M., Schneiß, D., & Sperling, A. (2025) · New Technology, Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.12293 · Cited by 74
Hastings, T. (2019) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbz010 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmalz, S., Ludwig, C., & Webster, E.
- Venue
- Global Labour Journal
- Publisher
- McMaster University Library
- Published
- 2018-05-31
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1918-6711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2806194988
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 45.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Power Resources Approach: Developments and Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15173/glj.v9i2.3569
- The paper
- Schmalz, S., Ludwig, C., & Webster, E. (2018). The Power Resources Approach: Developments and Challenges. Global Labour Journal. https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v9i2.3569
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.