Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 118Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyTraffic and Road SafetyTactile and Sensory Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward Developing an Approach for Alerting Drivers to the Direction of a Crash Threat

Fitch, Gregory M., Kiefer, Raymond J., Hankey, Jonathan M., Kleiner, Brian M.·2007·Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Abstract

Objective This study explored the potential for auditory and haptic spatial cuing approaches to alert drivers to the direction of a crash threat. Background For an automobile equipped with multiple crash avoidance systems, effective cuing of the crash threat direction may help the driver avoid the crash. Because the driver may not be looking in the direction of a visual crash alert, nonvisual crash alerts were explored as an additional means of directing attention to a potential crash situation. Methods In this in-traffic study, 32 drivers were asked to verbally report alert direction in the absence of any crash threats. Driver localization accuracy and response time were examined as a function of eight alert locations surrounding the vehicle and four directional alert approaches (auditory, haptic, haptic and auditory, and haptic and nondirectional auditory). The auditory directional alert approach used four speakers and broadband alert sounds, and the haptic directional alert approach used vibrations generated at various locations on the bottom of the driver's seat. Results Overall, relative to the auditory alert approach, the three approaches that included the haptic seat alert component reduced correct localization response times by 257 ms and increased percentage correct localization from 32% to 84%. Conclusion These results suggest that seat vibration alerts are a promising candidate for alerting drivers to the direction of a crash threat. Application These findings shou…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1518/001872007x215782

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Blauert, J., 1997, Spatial hearing: The psychophysics of human sound localization
  2. Edworthy, J., 1996, Warning design: A research perspective
  3. 10.1016/j.trf.2005.05.002 · DOI
  4. Kiefer, R.J., 2003, Forward collision warning requirements project final report - Tasks 2 and 3a: Surprise braking trials, time-to-collision judgments, and "first look" maneuvers under realistic rear-end crash conditions (Rep. No. DOT-HS-809-902)
  5. Kiefer, R.J., 1999, Forward collision warning systems: Development and validation of functional definitions and evaluation procedures for collision warning/avoidance systems (Rep. No. DOT-HS-808-964)
  6. 10.1111/1467-8659.00654 · DOI
  7. Lee, J.D., Hoffman, J.D. & Hayes, E. (2004). Collision warning design to mitigate driver distraction . In Proceedings of CHI (pp. 65-72). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. · DOI
  8. Sanders, M.S., 1993, Human factors in engineering design
  9. Tan, H.Z., 2003, Haptics-e, 3, 1
  10. Tan, A.K., 1996, Acoustic localization of in-vehicle crash avoidance warnings as a cue to hazard direction (Rep. No. DOT-HS-808-534)
  11. 10.1037/e577462012-035 · DOI
  12. U.S. Department of Transportation., 2005, Automotive collision avoidance system field operational test methods and results (Rep. No. DOT HS 809-900)
  13. 10.1037/e576862012-046 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Fitch, G. M., Kiefer, R. J., Hankey, J. M., & Kleiner, B. M.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Tech Transportation Institute (US)
  • General Motors (United States) (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Fitch, Gregory M.
Venue
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Published
2007-08
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
710-720
ISSN
  • 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-8181
OpenAlex
W2087627603
Cited by
118
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
crash avoidance systems, auditory alerts, haptic alerts, seat vibration, alert response time, driver attention
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Adult, Automobile Driving, Cognition, Equipment Failure, Female, Humans, Male, Man-Machine Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.