The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The future of archaeological theory
Abstract
In this latest contribution to our ‘Archaeological Futures’ series, Julian Thomas reflects on the current state of Western archaeological theory and how it is probably going to develop over the next few years. Archaeological theory has not ossified in the period since the processual/post-processual exchanges. The closer integration of archaeological thought with philosophical debate in the human sciences has gradually given rise to a theoretical landscape that would have been unrecognisable 30 years ago, wherein ‘new materialisms’ figure significantly.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“there is certainly little evidence in the GIS literature of any concomitant obligation to consider the implications for simple, binary-viewshed generation, of subsequent developments in phenomenological thinking (a good example being the increasing importance of Merleau-Ponty in Tilley's oeuvre) or engage in dialogue with the practitioners and theorists effecting such (Gillings 2012).”
From Mapping liminality: Critical frameworks for the GIS-based modelling of visibility (2017) · cites this paper as Thomas 2015
In the citing paper
“If the relationship between GIS and developments in archaeological theory has to date been fraught (see Gillings 2012), the broad sweep of approaches that have been brought together under the banner of the new materialism (Thomas 2015), offer considerable potential in helping to open up the space for a provocative new conceptual framework for GIS applications; one that offers a different set of”
From Mapping liminality: Critical frameworks for the GIS-based modelling of visibility (2017) · cites this paper as Thomas 2015
Citations
Cites
Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things
Hodder, I. (2012) · doi:10.1002/9781118241912 · Cited by 1,488
Prehistoric Materialities: Becoming Material in Prehistoric Britain and Ireland
Jones, A. M. (2012) · doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199556427.001.0001 · Cited by 97
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- 10.1017/S1380203814000105 · DOI
- 10.1086/662027 · DOI
- Braver, 2014, Heidegger
- 10.1080/00438240701679411 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S1380203813000159 · DOI
- Latour, 2005, Reassembling the social, 10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Gratton, 2014, Speculative realism
- Braver, 2007, A thing of this world: a history of continental anti-realism, 10.2307/j.ctv47w24v · DOI
- DeLanda, 2006, A new philosophy of society
- Wolfendale, 2014, Object-oriented philosophy
- Rae, 2013, Heidegger's influence on post-humanism, History of the Human Sciences, 26, 1
- 10.1007/s10816-005-6928-x · DOI
- 10.1017/CCO9780511753657.012 · DOI
- Niemoczynski, 2013, 21st century speculative philosophy, Cosmos and History, 9, 13
- Heidegger, 1977, The question concerning technology and other essays, 115
- 10.1215/9780822392996 · DOI
- 10.5749/minnesota/9780816689248.001.0001 · DOI
- Henare, 2007, Thinking through things, 10.4324/9780203088791 · DOI
- Domanska, 2006, The return to things, Archaeologia Polona, 44, 171
- Thomas, 2015, The Oxford handbook of Neolithic Europe, 1073
- 10.1086/673859 · DOI
- 10.1525/california/9780520274167.001.0001 · DOI
- Heidegger, 1971, Poetry, language, thought, 163
- Olsen, 2012, After interpretation: remembering archaeology, Current Swedish Archaeology, 20, 11, 10.37718/CSA.2012.01 · DOI
- Harman, 2009, Prince of networks: Bruno Latour and metaphysics
- Fowler, 2013, Archaeology after interpretation, 235
- 10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145920 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511558252 · DOI
- Jones, 2013, Archaeology after interpretation, 15
- 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199656370.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Bennett, 2010, Vibrant matter, 10.1215/9780822391623 · DOI
- 10.1080/00438240701679619 · DOI
- Miller, 1987, Material culture and mass consumption
- Alberti, 2013, Archaeology after interpretation, 43
- 10.1353/nlh.2014.0007 · DOI
- Meillassoux, 2008, After finitude, 10.5040/9781350252059 · DOI
- 10.5749/minnesota/9780816678976.003.0001 · DOI
- 10.5250/quiparle.19.2.0121 · DOI
- Lucas, 2012, Understanding the archaeological record, 10.1017/CBO9780511845772 · DOI
- Bintliff, 2011, The death of archaeological theory?, 7, 10.2307/j.ctvh1dk87.4 · DOI
- 10.1080/00293652.2013.779317 · DOI
- 10.1177/1359183515577176 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Anthropocene Divide: Obscuring Understanding of Social-Environmental Change
Bauer, A. M., & Ellis, E. C. (2018) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/697198 · Cited by 127
Mapping liminality: Critical frameworks for the GIS-based modelling of visibility
Gillings, M. (2017) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.004 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, J.
- Venue
- Antiquity
- Publisher
- Antiquity Publications
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 348
- Pages
- 1287-1296
- ISSN
- 0003-598X
- 1745-1744
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
