Cited by 27

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Taiwan's Early Metal Age and Southeast Asian trading systems

Hung, Hsiao-chun, Chao, Chin-yung·2016·Antiquity

Abstract

Taiwan presents a puzzling anomaly in the development and expansion of Southand Southeast Asian trade routes. The lack of historical records from theisland emphasises the value of archaeology for understanding theestablishment of trade and the transmission of people, ideas and knowledge.Recent research focusing on newly excavated sites such as Jiuxianglan showsthat the Metal Age in Taiwan began around 400 BC, much earlier than waspreviously thought. Furthermore, it seems that early trade predominantlyprioritised links to the south, and not, curiously, with Mainland China tothe immediate west as had traditionally been supposed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15184/aqy.2016.184

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Chao C.-Y. 2015. Early glass beads in prehistoric Taiwan and their significance in the Southeast Asia. Paper presented at the conference ‘Taiwan Maritime Landscapes from Neolithic to Early Modern Times: Cross-Regional Perspectives’, 18 November 2015, Paris.
  2. 10.1017/S0003598X00079679 · DOI
  3. Xiong, 2014, The Hepu Han tombs and the maritime Silk Road of the Han Dynasty, Antiquity, 88, 1229, 10.1017/S0003598X0011542X · DOI
  4. Lee, 2005, Report on salvage excavations in the Jiuxianglan site, Taidong
  5. 10.1017/CBO9781139015301 · DOI
  6. Indrawooth, 2004, Southeast Asia: from prehistory to history, 120
  7. Liu, 2002, Prehistoric cultures and populations in the Danshui River mouth
  8. Lankton, 2006, Early glass in Asian maritime trade: a review and an interpretation of compositional analyses, Journal of Glass Studies, 48, 121
  9. 10.1016/j.jas.2010.01.025 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Kuo, 2010, 2009 International Symposium on Austronesian Studies, 185
  11. 10.1017/S0959774315000207 · DOI
  12. Chen, 2011, A preliminary research of copper-based artefacts and related remains discovered in the Taiwan area, Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology (Academia Sinica), 82, 169
  13. Yang, 2012, The application of petrographic analysis to archaeological research examples from the artefacts and sherds of Jiuxianglan site, Taidong, Taiwan, Journal of Austronesian Studies, 3, 71
  14. Borao, 2001, Spaniards in Taiwan
  15. 10.1073/pnas.0707304104 · DOI
  16. Wong, 1999, The trade tradition of Taiwan, 45
  17. Hung H.-C. 2008. Migration and cultural interaction in southern coastal China, Taiwan and the northern Philippines, 3000 BC to AD 100: the early history of the Austronesian-speaking populations. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Australian National University.
  18. 10.2307/2794042 · DOI
  19. Lee, 2015, Sandstone moulds from Jiuxianglan, Taidong and their origin: a preliminary consideration, Field Archaeology of Taiwan, 18, 31
  20. Lee, 2007, Report on salvage excavations in the Jiuxianglan site, Taidong—the second season
  21. Kano, 1955, Outline Review of Taiwan Archaeology and Ethnology, 110
  22. Wong, 1995, Reference collection of Ketagalan, 104
  23. Lape, 2002, Voyages of discovery: the archaeology of islands, 223
  24. Alvarez, 1930, Formosa geográfica e históricamente considerada
  25. 10.1017/S0003598X00099312 · DOI
  26. Tingley, 2010, Arts of ancient Viet Nam
  27. Hung H.-C. 2005. The study of glass beads from the Philippines and Taiwan. Paper presented at the conference ‘Imported Goods Found in Taiwan: Glass Beads, Rings, and Earrings’, Taipei, 2005.
  28. Chin, 1987, Cultural heritage of Sarawak
  29. Bellina, 2004, Southeast Asia—from prehistory to history, 68
  30. Lee, 2002, New discoveries and new issues of the Beinan site, Taidong Historical Journal, 7, 40
  31. Chang, 1969, Fengpitou, Tapenkeng, and the prehistory of Taiwan
  32. 10.15184/aqy.2014.45 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s10963-011-9054-6 · DOI
  34. Francis, 2002, Asia's maritime bead trade: 300B.C. to the present
  35. Ling, 1962, Material culture of the Vataan Ami: a report on the material life of a Taiwan native tribe, 341
  36. Tan, 2008, Viêt Nam: from myth to modernity
  37. Hung, 2010, 50 years of archaeology in Southeast Asia: essays in honour of Ian Glover, 235
  38. 10.1017/S0959774314000547 · DOI
  39. 10.1080/15564894.2013.781085 · DOI
  40. Liu, 1963, The excavation of Baliben in Taipei, Taipei Archives (Tai Bei Wen Xian), 3, 52
  41. Lee, 2010, 2009 International Symposium on Austronesian Studies, 141
  42. Tsang, 2013, Archaeological heritage in Tainan Science Park of Taiwan
  43. 10.1371/journal.pone.0137542 · DOI
  44. Pongpanich, 2009, Beyond beads
  45. Chao, 2013, On ‘Upper Huagangshan Culture’: a proposal, Field Archaeology of Taiwan, 16, 53
  46. Ban, 2011, The Book of Han
  47. Hung, 2013, 4000 years of migration and cultural exchange: the archaeology of the Batanes Islands, northern Philippines, 149
  48. 10.7152/jipa.v34i0.14701 · DOI
  49. Liu, 2003, Prehistory and Classical civilization—papers from the Third International Conference on Sinology (History Section)
  50. Hung H.-C. & Y. Iizuka . In press. Nephrite and mica industries: a link towards the Austronesian world, in B. Bellina (ed.) Khao Sam Kaeo: a late prehistoric early port-city between the Indian Ocean and the South China Sea. Paris: École française d'Extrême-Orient.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hung, H.-C., & Chao, C.-Y.
Venue
Antiquity
Published
2016-11-21
Volume
90
Issue
354
Pages
1537-1551
ISSN
  • 0003-598X
  • 1745-1744
Cited by
27
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review