Cited by 2Ancient Egypt and ArchaeologyClassical Antiquity StudiesAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The afterlife of Egyptian statues: a cache of religious objects in the temple of Ptah at Karnak

Open access
Charloux, Guillaume, Thiers, Christophe, Abd Al-Aziz, Mohammad, Ali Abady Mahmoud, Mona, Boulet, Stéphanie, Bourse, Camille, Guadagnini, Kevin, Laroye, Juliette, ElNasseh, Ahmed Mohammed Sayed·2017·Antiquity

Abstract

The relationship of statues to the deities they represent is reflected in the special treatments they were often accorded during and after their primary use and display. In 2014 an unusual favissa—an intentionally hidden cache of religious objects—was discovered in the temple of Ptah at Karnak in Egypt. Such caches are generally poorly documented and difficult to date. The favissa contained numerous fragmentary statuettes and figurines, including 14 representing Osiris, carefully arranged around a larger central statue of Ptah. By comparing this cache with evidence from other Egyptian favissae, a hypothesis is proposed to explain the creation of such caches: the Osirian burial of an artefact, in this case the deposition of the ‘deceased’ statue of the god Ptah and its assimilation with Osiris, the god of rebirth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15184/aqy.2017.137

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The same form of damage is also common in statue caches or favissae.

    “The same form of damage is also common in statue caches or favissae (Valbelle 2016;Charloux et al. 2017;Charloux & Ali Abady Mahmoud 2019).”

    From The afterlife of Hatshepsut’s statuary (2025) · cites this paper as Charloux et al. 2017

    The Abstract (page unavailable) describes numerous fragmentary statuettes and figurines in a favissa, supporting the occurrence of damage in this cache. It does not identify the 'same form' of damage or establish that it is common across statue caches or favissae. (LLM, conf=0.68)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Traunecker, 2004, Dimensions réelles et dimensions imaginaires des dieux d'Egypte: les statues secrètes du temple d'Opet à Karnak, Ktèma, 29, 51
  2. Wahby Taher, 2011, News from Egypt, Ancient Egypt, 64, 9
  3. 10.3406/piot.1921.1816 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/3855583 · DOI
  5. Bianchi, 2014, Les bronzes égyptiens de la Fondation Gandur pour l'art
  6. Legrain, 1905, Renseignements sur les dernières découvertes faites à Karnak, Recueil de travaux relatifs à la philologie et à l'archéologie égyptiennes et assyriennes, 27, 61
  7. Barbotin, 2011, Statues égyptiennes et kouchites démembrées et reconstituées. Hommage à Charles Bonnet, 65
  8. Thiers, 2014, Armant: recent discoveries at the temple of Montu-Re, Egyptian Archaeology, 44, 32
  9. Faucher, 2017, Egyptian hoards I. The Ptolemies
  10. Coulon, 2014, Figures de dieux: construire le divin en images, 295, 10.4000/books.pur.89953 · DOI
  11. Saghir, 1992, La découverte de la cachette des statues du temple de Louxor
  12. Jambon, 2016, La Cachette de Karnak. Nouvelles perspectives sur les découvertes de G. Legrain, 131
  13. Biston-Moulin, 2016, Le temple de Ptah à Karnak I. Relevé épigraphique (Ptah, nos 1–191)
  14. 10.1179/175638009X427567 · DOI
  15. Thiers, 2013, Ägyptologische Tempeltagung. Kultabbildung und Kultrealität, 319
  16. Boraik, 2007, Stela of Bakenkhonsu, High Priest of Amun-Re, Memnonia, 18, 119
  17. Durand, 2015, Un four métallurgique d’époque ptolémaïque dans les annexes du temple de Ptah à Karnak, Cahiers de Karnak, 15, 181
  18. Vernus, 2016, La Cachette de Karnak. Nouvelles perspectives sur les découvertes de G. Legrain, 7
  19. Quibell, 1902, Hierakonpolis II
  20. Reddé, 1992, Douch IV: inventaire des objets et essai d'interprétation
  21. Kamel, 1968, A bronze hoard at Athribis, Annales du Service des Antiquités de l’Égypte, 60, 65
  22. Arnold, 1979, The temple of Mentuhotep at Deir El-Bahari
  23. Cauville, 1990, Le temple de Dendera: guide archéologique
  24. Cauville, 1987, Les statues cultuelles de Dendera d'après les inscriptions pariétales, Bulletin de l'Institut français d'archéologie orientale, 87, 73
  25. Coulon, 2016, Les chapelles osiriennes de Karnak. Aperçu des travaux récents, Bulletin de la Société française d’égyptologie, 195–96, 16
  26. Szafranski, 1985, Buried statues of Mentuhotep II Nebhepetre and Amenophis I at Deir el-Bahari, Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Abteilung Kairo, 41, 257
  27. Charloux, 2017, The early temple of Ptah at Karnak, Egyptian Archaeology, 50, 11
  28. Vernus, 1989, Caches au trésor dans l’Égypte pharaonique, Estudios de Egiptologia, 1, 33
  29. Legrain, 1906, Nouveaux renseignements sur les dernières découvertes faites à Karnak (15 novembre 1904–25 juillet 1905), Recueil de travaux relatifs à la philologie et à l'archéologie égyptiennes et assyriennes, 28, 137
  30. Weinstein, 1973, Foundation deposits in ancient Egypt
  31. Robichon, 1954, Karnak-Nord IV
  32. Charloux, 2012, Le parvis du temple d'Opet à Karnak. Exploration archéologique (2006–2007)
  33. Quack, 2010, Le culte d'Osiris au Ier millénaire av. J.-C.: découvertes et travaux récents. Actes de la table ronde internationale tenue à Lyon, Maison de l'Orient et de la Méditerranée (Université Lumière-Lyon 2) les 8 et 9 juillet 2005, 23
  34. Maspero, 1881, La trouvaille de Deir-el-Bahari
  35. Eaton-Krauss, 2008, Embalming caches, Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 94, 288, 10.1177/030751330809400115 · DOI
  36. Coulon, 2016, La Cachette de Karnak. Nouvelles perspectives sur les découvertes de G. Legrain
  37. Coulon, 2010, Le culte d'Osiris au Ier millénaire av. J.-C.: découvertes et travaux récents. Actes de la table ronde internationale tenue à Lyon, Maison de l'Orient et de la Méditerranée (Université Lumière-Lyon 2) les 8 et 9 juillet 2005, 1
  38. Pinch G. & E.A. Waraksa . 2009. Votive practices, in W. Wendrich , J. Dieleman , E. Frood & J. Baines (ed.) UCLA encyclopedia of Egyptology: 1–9. Available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7kp4n7rk (accessed 13 June 2017).
  39. David, 2013, La céramique d'un habitat du Ve siècle à Karnak, Cahiers de Karnak, 14, 287
  40. Quibell, 1898, The Ramesseum
  41. 10.1086/372952 · DOI
  42. Hegazy, 1989, A cache of jewellery from the edifice of Amenhotep II at Karnak, Varia Aegyptiaca, 5, 227
  43. Mond, 1940, Temples of Armant: a preliminary survey
  44. Kristensen, 2009, Embodied images: Christian response and destruction in Late Antique Egypt, Journal of Late Antiquity, 2, 220, 10.1353/jla.0.0054 · DOI
  45. Bonnet, 2005, Des pharaons venus d'Afrique: la cachette de Kerma
  46. Quack, 2004, Organiser le culte idéal. Le Manuel du temple, Bulletin de la Société française d'egyptologie, 160, 9
  47. Ben-Tor, 2006, Confronting the past: archaeological and historical essays on ancient Israel in honor of William G. Dever, 4
  48. Schmitt, 2015, Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of Egyptologists 2, 443

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Charloux, G., Thiers, C., Abd Al-Aziz, M., Ali Abady Mahmoud, M., Boulet, S., Bourse, C., Guadagnini, K., Laroye, J., & ElNasseh, A. M. S.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier (FR)
Corresponding author
Charloux, Guillaume
Venue
Antiquity
Published
2017-09-20
Volume
91
Issue
359
Pages
1189-1204
ISSN
  • 0003-598X (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1744
OpenAlex
W2753950481
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antiquity (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR11-LABX0032-01, ANR-11-LABX-0032)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Keywords
ancient Egyptian sculpture, Temple of Ptah, Karnak, sacred objects, grave goods, afterlife, ancient Egyptian religion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review