Cited by 47Archaeological and Geological StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesHistorical and Architectural Studies

Evaluating Chaco migration scenarios using dynamic social network analysis

Open access
Mills, Barbara J., Peeples, Matthew A., Aragon, Leslie D., Bellorado, Benjamin A., Clark, Jeffery J., Giomi, Evan, Windes, Thomas C.·2018·Antiquity

Abstract

Migration was a key social process contributing to the creation of the ‘Chaco World’ between AD 800 and 1200. Dynamic social network analysis allows for evaluation of several migration scenarios, and demonstrates that Chaco’s earliest ninth-century networks show interaction with areas to the west and south, rather than migration to the Canyon from the Northern San Juan. By the late eleventh century, Chaco Canyon was tied strongly to the Middle and Northern San Juan, while a twelfth-century retraction of networks separated the Northern and Southern San Juan areas prior to regional depopulation. Understanding Chaco migration is important for comprehending both its uniqueness in U.S. Southwest archaeology and for comparison with other case studies worldwide.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15184/aqy.2018.86

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is currently no independent archaeological evidence-such as ceramic patterning or biochemical data-that supports an influx of northern populations in the ninth century AD.

    “There is, however, currently no independent archaeological evidence-such as ceramic patterning or biochemical data-that supports an influx of northern populations in the ninth century AD (see Kantner 2012;Price et al. 2017;Mills et al. 2018).”

    From The complex history of Pueblo Bonito and its interpretation (2018) · cites this paper as Mills et al. 2018

    The Migration scenario 1 section reports a gap in ninth-century ceramic-network ties between Chaco and the Northern San Juan, and says isotopic signatures from Pueblo Bonito did not overlap with those from northern areas. The Conclusions say there is “little evidence” for migration from the Northern San Juan in the AD 800s, not no evidence; Migration scenario 1 also describes evidence of communities arriving from northern regions in the late AD 800s. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Akins, N.J. 1986. The burials of Pueblo Bonito, in J.E. Neitzel (ed.) Pueblo Bonito: center of the Chacoan World: 94-106.
  2. Anthony, D.W. 1990. Migration in archeology: the baby and the bathwater. American Anthropologist 92: 895-914. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1990.92.4.02a00030 Birch, J. 2012. Coalescent communities: settlement aggregation and social integration in Iroquoian Ontario. American Antiquity 77: 646-70. https://doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.77.4.646 · DOI
  3. Crown, P.L. (ed.). 2016. The Pueblo Bonito mounds of Chaco Canyon: material culture and fauna. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  4. Duff, A.I. & A.L. Nauman. 2010. Engendering the landscape: resource acquisition, artifact manufacture, and household organization in a Chacoan great house community, in B. Roth (ed.) Engendering landscapes in the prehistoric Southwest: 12-33. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  5. Hays-Gilpin, K.A. & E. van Hartesveldt. 1998. Prehistoric ceramics of the Puerco Valley: the 1995 Chambers-Sanders Trust Lands Ceramic Conference (Museum of Northern Arizona Ceramic Series 7). Flagstaff: Museum of Northern Arizona.
  6. Judge, W.J. & L.S. Cordell. 2006. Society and polity, in S.H. Lekson (ed.) The archaeology of Chaco Canyon: an eleventh century Pueblo regional center: 189-210. Santa Fe (NM): SAR.
  7. -2015. The Chaco meridian: one thousand years of political and religious power in the ancient Southwest (2 nd edition). Lanham (MD): Rowman & Littlefield.
  8. Mills, B.J. 2008. Remembering while forgetting: depositional practice and social memory at Chaco, in B.J. Mills & W.H. Walker (ed.) Memory work: archaeologies of material practices: 81-108. Santa Fe (NM): SAR. -2016. Communities of consumption: cuisines as networks of situated practice, in A.P. Roddick & A.B. Stahl (ed.) Knowledge in motion, constellations of learning across time and place: 248-70. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  9. Toll, H.W. 2006. Organization of production, in S.H. Lekson (ed.) The archaeology of Chaco Canyon: an eleventh century Pueblo regional center: 117-52. Santa Fe (NM): SAR.
  10. Webster, L.D., L.S. Cordell, K. Hays-Gilpin & E.A. Jolie. 2014. In praise of collections research: Basketmaker roots of Chacoan ritual practices, in N.J. Parezo & J.C. Janetski (ed.) Archaeology in the Great Basin and Southwest: papers in honor of Don D. Fowler: 322-35. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
  11. Wilshusen, R.H. 2015. Chaco's beginnings: what we know now, and what to do next, in T.C. Windes (ed.) Early Puebloan occupations in the Chaco region, volume I: excavations and survey of Basketmaker III and Pueblo I sites, Chaco Canyon, New Mexico (Arizona State Museum Archaeological Series 210): 745-61. Tucson: Arizona State Museum.
  12. Wilshusen, R.H. & R.M. Van Dyke. 2006. Chaco's beginning, in S.H. Lekson (ed.) The archaeology of Chaco Canyon: an eleventh-century Pueblo regional center: 211-59. Santa Fe (NM): SAR.
  13. Windes, T.C. 2007. Gearing up and piling on: early great houses in the Chaco Basin, in S.H. Lekson (ed.) Architecture of Chaco Canyon, New Mexico: 45-92. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
  14. -2015. Early great house beginnings, in T.C. Windes (ed.) Early Puebloan occupations in the Chaco region, volume I: excavations and survey of Basketmaker III and Pueblo I sites, Chaco Canyon, New Mexico (Arizona State Museum Archaeological Series 210): 663-744. Tucson: Arizona State Museum.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mills, B. J., Peeples, M. A., Aragon, L. D., Bellorado, B. A., Clark, J. J., Giomi, E., & Windes, T. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Archaeology Southwest (US)
Corresponding author
Mills, Barbara J.
Venue
Antiquity
Published
2018-08
Volume
92
Issue
364
Pages
922-939
ISSN
  • 0003-598X (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1744
OpenAlex
W2888715580
Cited by
47
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
FWCI
20.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Antiquity (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1355374, 1355381)
  • Arizona State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical and Architectural Studies
Keywords
Chaco Canyon, migration scenarios, regional depopulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review