The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Towards a dialogical archaeology: an Andean perspective on hermeneutics, interpretation and political praxis
Abstract
Taking a geopolitical perspective centred in the Argentinian Andes, the authors propose a hermeneutical view of dialogical archaeology. The application of this theoretical and methodological approach to the example of the archaeological site of Huayatayoc (Puna de Jujuy, Argentina) enables an interpretation of the site as a complex woven fabric of diachronic local and scientific practices and narratives. The authors’ work at Huayatayoc provides an example of the potential of this approach for the development of a critical Latin American archaeology, which seeks to acknowledge the multiple interests and narratives of researchers and local communities in dialogue.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Beyond confirming patterns previously proposed in the literature, these findings support and add to previous studies done with different methods10,29,31, reinforce previously collected ethnographic data about Indigenous agropastoral practices14, and may contribute to Indigenous land tenure processes under Argentinian constitutional rights and territorial ancestral land rights (Argentine law No. 26”
From Multiscale anthropogenic feature detection in the argentinian andes: satellite machine learning, UAV, and pedestrian survey (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 10.25074/rantros.v6i12.1160 · DOI
- 10.1080/00438243.1998.9980395 · DOI
- Pey, 2020a, De andenes y hebras: propuesta para una interpretación textil de los paisajes agrícolas andinos, Mundo de Antes, 14, 79, 10.59516/mda.v14.24 · DOI
- Curtoni, 2009, Perspectivas actuales en Arqueología Argentina, 13
- 10.2307/280968 · DOI
- Ingold, 2000, The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill
- Tantaleán, 2013, La arqueología social Latinoamericana: de la teoría a la praxis
- Vaquer, 2013b, La tradición como límite de la interpretación: un ejemplo desde Cruz Vinto (Norte de Lípez, Bolivia), Relaciones de la Sociedad Argentina de Antropología, 38, 269
- Hodder, 1986, Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology
- Palacios Ríos, 1977, Pastores de puna: uywamichiq punarunakuna, 155
- Mancuso, 2005, La palabra viva: teoría verbal y discursiva de Michail M. Bachtin
- Thomas, 2001, Archaeological theory today, 165
- Gose, 2004, Aguas mortíferas y cerros hambrientos: rito agrario y formación de clases en un pueblo andino
- Gadamer, 2003, Verdad y Método I
- Pey, 2020b, Trama y urdimbre: hacia una biografía del sitio agropastoril Huayatayoc (Cusi Cusi, Puna de Jujuy, Argentina), Estudios Atacameños, 65, 313
- Giddens, 1998, La constitución de la sociedad: bases para la teoría de la estructuración
- Olsen, 2010, In defense of things: archaeology and the ontology of objects
- 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x · DOI
- Villanueva Criales, 2018, Arqueología de la ruptura colonial: mouros, chullpas, gentiles y abuelos en España, Bolivia y Chile en perspectiva comparada, Estudios Atacameños, 60, 9
- Gnecco, 2016, Arqueología y decolonialidad, 46
- Shepherd, 2016, Arqueología y decolonialidad
- Todorov, 2012, Mijail Bajtín: el principio dialógico
- Salerno, 2012, Pensar la arqueología desde el sur, Complutum, 23, 191
- De Feo, 2004, Libro de resúmenes del XV Congreso Nacional de Arqueología Argentina
- Aguilar Díaz, 2008, El vuelo de Hermes: una crítica a la posmodernidad en la Arqueología desde los Andes, Maguaré, 22, 397
- Hodder, 1999, The archaeological process: an introduction
- 10.25058/20112742.344 · DOI
- Lévinas, 2002, Totalidad e Infinito: ensayo sobre la Exterioridad
- Guber, 2001, La etnografía, método, campo y reflexividad
- 10.2307/3557079 · DOI
- 10.4067/S0718-10432015000200003 · DOI
- Rivera Cusicanqui, 2010, Ch'ixinakax utxiwa: una reflexión sobre prácticas y discursos descolonizadores
- Politis, 2006, Foro de discusión: el panorama teórico en diálogo. Ponencia, oponencias y réplica, Arqueología Suramericana, 2, 167
- 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095858 · DOI
- 10.1590/S1981-81222009000100003 · DOI
- Vaquer, 2020, Prácticas, narrativas y temporalidad en Cusi Cusi (Rinconada, Jujuy): una mirada hermenéutica, Andes, 31, 1
- Criado Boado, 2006, ¿Se puede evitar la trampa de la subjetividad? Sobre arqueología e interpretación, Complutum, 17, 247
- 10.7440/2013.03 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470693520 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511812507 · DOI · Paper page
- Shanks, 1987, Social theory and archaeology
- 10.24215/25456377e050 · DOI
- Cruz, 2005, El lado oscuro del mundo: una cartografía de la percepción de los sitios arqueológicos en los Andes meridionales (Laguna Blanca, Catamarca-Argentina, y Potosí-Bolivia), Boletín del SIARB, 19, 38
- Flores, 2015, Pueblos originarios y arqueología Argentina: construyendo un diálogo intercultural y reconstruyendo la arqueología, Intersecciones en Antropología, 16, 179
- Heidegger, 2012, Ser y Tiempo
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Peters, M. J. H., Jambajantsan, A., Freire, V. Z., Pey, L., Vaquer, J. M., & Roberts, P. (2026) · npj Heritage Science · doi:10.1038/s40494-026-02813-z
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vaquer, J. M., & Pey, L.
- Venue
- Antiquity
- Publisher
- Antiquity Publications
- Published
- 2021-11-10
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 385
- Pages
- 179-193
- ISSN
- 0003-598X
- 1745-1744
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
