The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effects of Compensatory Acceleration on Upper-Body Strength and Power in Collegiate Football Players
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of maximum concentric acceleration training versus traditional upper-body training on the development of strength and power of collegiate NCAA Division 1AA football players. Power was tested with a seated medicine ball throw (n = 30) and a force platform plyometric push-up test (n = 24). Upper-body strength was tested by using a bench press with 1 repetition maximum (1RM) (n = 30). All players were on an identical off-season weight-training program. The control group performed exercises with conventional concentric velocity and the experimental group performed the concentric phase of each repetition as rapidly as possible. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to determine training and group differences. Significant training effects for all strength and power measures indicated that both groups increased strength and power. Significant training by group interaction indicates the experimental group increased significantly more than the control group in the bench press (+9.85 kg vs. +5.00 kg) and throw (+0.69 m vs. +0.22 m). Significance was not reached for any of the training by group interactions for force platform variables (amortization time -0.46 seconds for the experimental group vs. -0.22 seconds for the control group; average power was +365 W for the experimental group vs. +108 W for the control group). The results of this study support the use of maximal acceleration of concentric contractions by co…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“some found greater strength gains when performing the repetitions at fast velocities [ 17 , 20 , 25 -27 ]”
From Effect of Movement Velocity during Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance (2014) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Some of these studies found greater strength gains when performing the repetitions at fast velocities [ 17 , 20 , 25 -27 ]”
From Effect of Movement Velocity during Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance (2014) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“However, very little scientifi c evidence exists on the eff ect of movement velocity on measures of dynamic athletic performance [ 5 , 19 , 20 , 24 , 25 ] .”
From Effect of Movement Velocity during Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance (2014) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults
(2009) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3181915670 · Cited by 4,332
Fundamentals of Resistance Training: Progression and Exercise Prescription
KRAEMER, W. J., & RATAMESS, N. A. (2004) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000121945.36635.61 · Cited by 1,992
Effect of Movement Velocity during Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance
Pareja-Blanco, F., Rodríguez-Rosell, D., Sánchez-Medina, L., Gorostiaga, E., & González-Badillo, J. (2014) · International Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-0033-1363985 · Cited by 218
Davies, T. B., Kuang, K., Orr, R., Halaki, M., & Hackett, D. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0676-4 · Cited by 117
Internal validity in resistance training research: a systematic review.
Makaruk, H., Starzak, M., Płaszewski, M., & Winchester, J. B. (2022) · Journal of Sports Science and Medicine · doi:10.52082/jssm.2022.308 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- JONES, K., HUNTER, G., FLEISIG, G., ESCAMILLA, R., & LEMAK, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 99-105
- ISSN
- 1064-8011
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Compensatory Acceleration on Upper-Body Strength and Power in Collegiate Football Players. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1519/00124278-199905000-00001
- The paper
- JONES, K., HUNTER, G., FLEISIG, G., ESCAMILLA, R., & LEMAK, L. (1999). The Effects of Compensatory Acceleration on Upper-Body Strength and Power in Collegiate Football Players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-199905000-00001