Cited by 37Lower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesSports Performance and TrainingSports Dynamics and Biomechanics

Biomechanical Model and Evaluation of a Linear Motion Squat Type Exercise

ABELBECK, KEVIN G.·2002·Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

A biomechanical model of a squat exercise performed on a device using a bar that is restricted to a linear motion was developed. Hip and knee moments were evaluated at varying foot positions. The range of motion of the exercise was limited by the knee joint angle beginning at an 80 degrees angle (flexed) to a 179 degrees joint angle (extended). Variations in foot placement were evaluated for differences in torque applied about the transverse axes of the user's knee and hip joints. Because the user's feet were positioned farther forward (anterior), the moment about the knee decreased whereas the moment about the hip increased. Positive moments were those that resulted in forces to flex the knee and hip joints. Positive knee moments were determined in all conditions when the knee was flexed and became negative when the knee was at or near full extension. The model always produced positive moments about the hip. Thus, foot position is a critical factor in hip and knee moments, and therefore in the muscle groups stressed, in a linear motion squat type exercise.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/00124278-200211000-00005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To the best of the authors' knowledge, no previous study has considered how angular and linear kinematics of the back squat vary at different load intensities.

    “However, these studies have evaluated the biomechanics of different types of squats but, to the best of our knowledge, none of these have considered how these can vary at different load intensities.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ABELBECK, K. G.
Corresponding author
ABELBECK, KEVIN G.
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2002-11
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
516-524
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090775676
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Keywords
squatting, biomechanical modeling, hip joint moments, knee joint moments, foot position, knee flexion and extension, muscle loading
MeSH terms
Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Hip Joint, Humans, Knee Joint, Male, Models, Anatomic, Muscle Contraction, Posture, Sensitivity and Specificity, Exercise, Range of Motion, Articular, Muscle, Skeletal, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review