Biomechanical Model and Evaluation of a Linear Motion Squat Type Exercise
Abstract
A biomechanical model of a squat exercise performed on a device using a bar that is restricted to a linear motion was developed. Hip and knee moments were evaluated at varying foot positions. The range of motion of the exercise was limited by the knee joint angle beginning at an 80 degrees angle (flexed) to a 179 degrees joint angle (extended). Variations in foot placement were evaluated for differences in torque applied about the transverse axes of the user's knee and hip joints. Because the user's feet were positioned farther forward (anterior), the moment about the knee decreased whereas the moment about the hip increased. Positive moments were those that resulted in forces to flex the knee and hip joints. Positive knee moments were determined in all conditions when the knee was flexed and became negative when the knee was at or near full extension. The model always produced positive moments about the hip. Thus, foot position is a critical factor in hip and knee moments, and therefore in the muscle groups stressed, in a linear motion squat type exercise.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
To the best of the authors' knowledge, no previous study has considered how angular and linear kinematics of the back squat vary at different load intensities.
“However, these studies have evaluated the biomechanics of different types of squats but, to the best of our knowledge, none of these have considered how these can vary at different load intensities.”
From Kinematic analysis of the back squat at different load intensities in powerlifters and weightlifters (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lorenzetti, S., Gülay, T., Stoop, M., List, R., Gerber, H., Schellenberg, F., & Stüssi, E. (2012) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0b013e318267918b · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Load-dependent mechanical demands of the lower extremity during the back and front squat
Krzyszkowski, J., & Kipp, K. (2020) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2020.1766738 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Kinematic analysis of the back squat at different load intensities in powerlifters and weightlifters
Giustino, V., Vicari, D. S. S., Figlioli, F., Gervasi, M., Fernández Peña, E., Schifaudo, N., Tedesco, M., Drid, P., Paoli, A., Battaglia, G., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2024.1454309 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- ABELBECK, K. G.
- Corresponding author
- ABELBECK, KEVIN G.
- Venue
- Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 516-524
- ISSN
- 1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090775676
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
- Keywords
- squatting, biomechanical modeling, hip joint moments, knee joint moments, foot position, knee flexion and extension, muscle loading
- MeSH terms
- Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Hip Joint, Humans, Knee Joint, Male, Models, Anatomic, Muscle Contraction, Posture, Sensitivity and Specificity, Exercise, Range of Motion, Articular, Muscle, Skeletal, Statistics, Nonparametric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review