Cited by 209Sports Performance and TrainingPhysical Education and Training StudiesSport Psychology and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Importance of Isometric Maximum Strength and Peak Rate-of-Force Development in Sprint Cycling

Stone, Michael H., Sands, William A., Carlock, Jon, Callan, Sam, Dickie, Des, Daigle, Karen, Cotton, John, Smith, Sarah L., Hartman, Michael·2004·The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the relationship of whole-body maximum strength to variables potentially associated with track sprint-cycling success. These variables included body composition, power measures, coach's rank, and sprint-cycling times. The study was carried out in 2 parts. The first part (n = 30) served as a pilot for the second part (n = 20). Subjects for both parts ranged from international-caliber sprint cyclists to local-level cyclists. Maximum strength was measured using an isometric midthigh pull (IPF). Explosive strength was measured as the peak rate-of-force development (IPRFD) from the isometric force-time curve. Peak power was estimated from countermovement (CMJPP) and static vertical jumps (SJPP) and measured by modified Wingate tests. Athletes were ranked by the U.S. national cycling coach (part 1). Sprint times (from a standing start) were measured using timing gates placed at 25, 82.5, 165, 247.5, and 330 m of an outdoor velodrome (part 2). Maximum strength (both absolute and body-mass corrected) and explosive strength were shown to be strongly correlated with jump and Wingate power. Additionally, maximum strength was strongly correlated with both coach's rank (parts 1 and 2) and sprint cycling times (part 2). The results suggest that larger, stronger sprint cyclists have an advantage in producing power and are generally faster sprint cyclists.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/14874.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous researchers investigating the CMJ ability of elite male amateur boxers have reported mean values of 36.0 to 43.1 cm.

    “Previous researchers investigating the CMJ ability of elite male amateur boxers have reported mean values of 36.0 to 43.1 cm (12,18,19,27,34,38) (see Table 3).”

    From The Role of Strength on Punch Impact Force in Boxing (2022) · cites this paper as [38]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stone, M. H., Sands, W. A., Carlock, J., Callan, S., Dickie, D., Daigle, K., Cotton, J., Smith, S. L., & Hartman, M.
Affiliations
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (US)
Venue
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2004
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
878
ISSN
  • 1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4287
OpenAlex
W2002193504
Cited by
209
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
sprint cycling, explosive strength, Wingate test, body composition, sprint time
MeSH terms
Adult, Bicycling, Body Composition, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Isometric Contraction, Male, Pilot Projects, Weight Lifting, Reproducibility of Results, Body Mass Index, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review