Comparison of total and segmental body composition using DXA and multifrequency bioimpedance in collegiate female athletes
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the agreement between multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for measuring body fat percentage (BF%), fat-free mass (FFM), and total body and segmental lean soft tissue (LST) in collegiate female athletes. Forty-five female athletes (age = 21.2 ± 2.0 years, height = 166.1 ± 7.1 cm, weight = 62.6 ± 9.9 kg) participated in this study. Variables measured through BIA and DXA were as follows: BF%, FFM, and LST of the arms (ARMS(LST)), the legs (LEGS(LST)), the trunk (TRUNK(LST)), and the total body (TOTAL(LST)). Compared with the DXA, the InBody 720 provided significantly lower values for BF% (-3.3%, p < 0.001) and significantly higher values for FFM (2.1 kg, p < 0.001) with limits of agreement (1.96 SD of the mean difference) of ±5.6% for BF% and ±3.7 kg for FFM. No significant differences (p < 0.008) existed between the 2 devices (InBody 720-DXA) for ARMS(LST) (0.05 kg), TRUNK(LST) (0.14 kg), LEGS(LST) (-0.4 kg), and TOTAL(LST) (-0.21 kg). The limits of agreement were ±0.79 kg for ARMS(LST), ±2.62 kg for LEGS(LST), ±3.18 kg for TRUNK(LST), and ±4.23 kg for TOTAL(LST). This study found discrepancies in BF% and FFM between the 2 devices. However, the InBody 720 and DXA appeared to provide excellent agreement for measuring total body and segmental LST. Therefore, the InBody 720 may be a rapid noninvasive method to assess LST in female athletes when DXA is not available.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other investigations comparing MF-BIA with DXA reported similar findings for total body and segmental soft tissue measures.
“Similarly, other investigations comparing MF-BIA with DXA in body composition evaluation reported similar findings for total body and segmental soft tissue measures (31).”
From Transforming body composition with semaglutide in adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 122
- Authors
- Esco, M. R., Snarr, R. L., Leatherwood, M. D., Chamberlain, N. A., Redding, M. L., Flatt, A. A., Moon, J. R., & Williford, H. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama (US)
- Auburn University at Montgomery (US)
- MusclePharm Sports Science Institute (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Esco, Michael R.
- Venue
- Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 918-925
- ISSN
- 1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057387266
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 2.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BearWorks (Missouri State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
- Keywords
- body composition, multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, measurement agreement, body fat percentage, fat-free mass, female athletes, collegiate athletes
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Arm, Female, Humans, Leg, Absorptiometry, Photon, Electric Impedance, Adiposity, Young Adult, Torso
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review