Cited by 71Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutritionCoffee research and impacts

Carbohydrate and Caffeine Mouth Rinses Do Not Affect Maximum Strength and Muscular Endurance Performance

Open access
Clarke, Neil D., Kornilios, Evangelos, Richardson, Darren L.·2015·Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

Oral carbohydrate (CHO) rinsing has beneficial effects on endurance performance and caffeine (CAF) mouth rinsing either independently or in conjunction with CHO may enhance sprinting performance. However, the effects of CHO and CAF mouth rinses on resistance exercise have not been examined previously. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of CHO and CAF rinsing on maximum strength and muscular endurance performance. Fifteen recreationally resistance-trained males completed an exercise protocol, which involved a 1 repetition maximum (RM) bench press followed by 60% of their 1RM to failure in a double-blind, randomized, counterbalanced crossover design. Before exercise, 25 ml of a 6% (15 g; 0.20 ± 0.02 g·kg(-1)) CHO, 1.2% (300 mg; 3.9 ± 0.3 mg·kg(-1)) CAF, carbohydrate with caffeine (C + C) solutions, or water (placebo; PLA) were rinsed for 10 seconds. During the remaining session, no solution was rinsed (control; CON). All solutions were flavored with (200 mg) sucralose. Felt arousal was recorded pre- and post-rinse, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was recorded immediately after the repetitions to failure. There were no significant differences in 1RM (p = 0.808; ηp(2)= 0.02), the number of repetitions performed (p = 0.682; ηp(2)= 0.03), or the total exercise volume (p = 0.482; ηp(2)= 0.03) between conditions. Rating of perceived exertion was similar for all trials (p = 0.330; ηp(2)= 0.08), whereas Felt arousal increased as a consequence of rinsing (p = 0.001; ηp(2)= 0.58), but was not different between trials (p = 0.335; ηp(2)= 0.08). These results suggest that rinsing with a CHO and CAF solution either independently or combined has no significant effect on maximum strength or muscular endurance performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/jsc.0000000000000945

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some but not all studies have supported the ability of carbohydrate mouth rinsing to increase performance.

    “While this concept is still emerging, some [449–452] but not all [453–455] of the studies have supported the ability of carbohydrate mouth rinsing to increase performance.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 71

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Earle, RW, and Baechle, TR. Resistance training and spotting techniques. In: Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning (3 rd ed.). Baechle, TR and Earle, RW, eds. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2008. pp. 325-376.

Authors
Clarke, N. D., Kornilios, E., & Richardson, D. L.
Affiliations
Coventry (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Clarke, Neil D.
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2015-10
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
2926-2931
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006252266
Cited by
71
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Coventry University Open Collections (Coventry university) (submittedVersion)
  • The Open Collections (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
Keywords
carbohydrate mouth rinse, resistance training, muscular endurance, maximal strength, one-repetition maximum, bench press, rating of perceived exertion, exercise performance
MeSH terms
Adult, Caffeine, Dietary Carbohydrates, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Male, Mouthwashes, Physical Endurance, Muscle, Skeletal, Cross-Over Studies, Muscle Strength, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review