Cited by 116Nutrition and Health in AgingMuscle metabolism and nutritionMuscle Physiology and Disorders

The Effect of Resistance Training and Different Sources of Postexercise Protein Supplementation on Muscle Mass and Physical Capacity in Sarcopenic Elderly Men

Maltais, Mathieu L., Ladouceur, Joëlle P., Dionne, Isabelle J.·2016·Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

The loss of muscle mass (sarcopenia) with aging is related to a progressive loss of muscle strength and physical capacity. Resistance exercise and milk-based protein supplementation have been demonstrated as significant countermeasures for sarcopenia and the loss of muscle strength. However, using high doses of proteins can act as a meal replacement in the elderly. Therefore, we sought to determine whether a standard supplementation (12 g per serving) of protein and resistance training could be an efficient strategy to promote muscle strength and physical capacity in sarcopenic men. Twenty-six participants were randomized in 3 groups in a double-blind control study. All the groups performed exercise and consumed a protein-rich supplement 12 g of protein, 7 g of essential amino acids from milk (n = 8), soy (n = 8), or rice milk (nonprotein control, n = 10). Body composition was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Strength was measured by 1 repetition maximum with different exercises. Different physical capacity measurements were assessed (timed up and go test, chair stand, and walking speed). The results indicated a significant increase in fat-free mass in all groups and changes in muscle strength, with no differences between groups. This study indicates that resistance training is an effective way to increase muscle mass and strength, regardless of protein supplementation. Higher doses of protein-rich foods may have to be recommended to promote muscle mass gains when executing resistance exercise in elderly sarcopenic individuals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001255

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 116

Authors
Maltais, M. L., Ladouceur, J. P., & Dionne, I. J.
Affiliations
Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
Corresponding author
Dionne, Isabelle J.
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2016-06
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
1680-1687
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2320906963
Cited by
116
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Dairy Farmers of Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
sarcopenia, resistance training, protein supplementation, older men, muscle mass, muscle strength, physical capacity, milk protein, soy protein, rice milk, fat-free mass, essential amino acids
MeSH terms
Aged, Animals, Body Composition, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Milk, Milk Proteins, Exercise, Absorptiometry, Photon, Muscle, Skeletal, Dietary Supplements, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review