Longer Interset Rest Periods Enhance Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy in Resistance-Trained Men
Abstract
Schoenfeld, BJ, Pope, ZK, Benik, FM, Hester, GM, Sellers, J, Nooner, JL, Schnaiter, JA, Bond-Williams, KE, Carter, AS, Ross, CL, Just, BL, Henselmans, M, and Krieger, JW. Longer interset rest periods enhance muscle strength and hypertrophy in resistance-trained men. J Strength Cond Res 30(7): 1805–1812, 2016—The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of short rest intervals normally associated with hypertrophy-type training versus long rest intervals traditionally used in strength-type training on muscular adaptations in a cohort of young, experienced lifters. Twenty-one young resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to either a group that performed a resistance training (RT) program with 1-minute rest intervals (SHORT) or a group that employed 3-minute rest intervals (LONG). All other RT variables were held constant. The study period lasted 8 weeks with subjects performing 3 total body workouts a week comprised 3 sets of 8–12 repetition maximum (RM) of 7 different exercises per session. Testing was performed prestudy and poststudy for muscle strength (1RM bench press and back squat), muscle endurance (50% 1RM bench press to failure), and muscle thickness of the elbow flexors, triceps brachii, and quadriceps femoris by ultrasound imaging. Maximal strength was significantly greater for both 1RM squat and bench press for LONG compared to SHORT. Muscle thickness was significantly greater for LONG compared to SHORT in the anterior thigh, and a trend for greater increases was noted in the triceps brachii ( p = 0.06) as well. Both groups saw significant increases in local upper body muscle endurance with no significant differences noted between groups. This study provides evidence that longer rest periods promote greater increases in muscle strength and hypertrophy in young resistance-trained men.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Given research showing a potential hypertrophic detriment to employing short rest intervals in resistance-trained individuals, differences in rest periods may have confounded the results of Mangine et al.
“Given research showing a potential hypertrophic detriment to employing short rest intervals in resistance-trained individuals [50,51], it is conceivable that differences in rest periods may have confounded the results of Mangine et al. [22].”
From Loading recommendations for muscle strength, hypertrophy, and local endurance: a re-examination of the repetition continuum. (2021) · cites this paper as [50]
Cites
Fundamentals of Resistance Training: Progression and Exercise Prescription
KRAEMER, W. J., & RATAMESS, N. A. (2004) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000121945.36635.61 · Cited by 1,992 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The preponderance of this research has focused on determining optimal strategies for manipulating volume and load, which are considered primary drivers of strength and hypertrophy (13).”
BackgroundSkeletal muscle hypertrophy and atrophy signaling pathways
Glass, D. J. (2005) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2005.04.018 · Cited by 1,106 · see citing works
Wernbom, M., Augustsson, J., & Thome??, R. (2007) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200737030-00004 · Cited by 583 · see citing works
Training adaptations in the behavior of human motor units
Duchateau, J., Semmler, J. G., & Enoka, R. M. (2006) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00543.2006 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Single versus multiple sets of resistance exercise: a meta-regression.
Krieger, J. W. (2009) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181b370be · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Self-citationNutrient timing revisited: is there a post-exercise anabolic window?
Aragon, A. A., & Schoenfeld, B. J. (2013) · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · doi:10.1186/1550-2783-10-5 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The importance of muscular strength: Training considerations
Suchomel, T. J., Nimphius, S., Bellon, C. R., & Stone, M. H. (2018) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-018-0862-z · Cited by 940 · see citing works
Schoenfeld, B. J., Grgic, J., Van Every, D. W., & Plotkin, D. L. (2021) · Sports · doi:10.3390/sports9020032 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Self-citationTraining for strength and hypertrophy: an evidence-based approach.
Morton, R. W., Colenso-Semple, L., & Phillips, S. M. (2019) · Current Opinion in Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.cophys.2019.04.006 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Nuzzo, J. L., Pinto, M. D., Nosaka, K., & Steele, J. (2024) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-023-01937-7 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Gomes, G. K., Franco, C. M., Nunes, P. R. P., & Orsatti, F. L. (2019) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000002559 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Complexity: A Novel Load Progression Strategy in Strength Training
La Scala Teixeira, C. V., Evangelista, A. L., Pereira, P. E. D. A., Da Silva-Grigoletto, M. E., Bocalini, D. S., & Behm, D. G. (2019) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00839 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Pre- versus post-exercise protein intake has similar effects on muscular adaptations
Schoenfeld, B. J., Aragon, A., Wilborn, C., Urbina, S. L., Hayward, S. E., & Krieger, J. (2017) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.2825 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationSinger, A., Wolf, M., Generoso, L., Arias, E., Delcastillo, K., Echevarria, E., Martinez, A., Androulakis Korakakis, P., Refalo, M. C., Swinton, P. A., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2024.1429789 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Schoenfeld, B. J., Pope, Z. K., Benik, F. M., Hester, G. M., Sellers, J., Nooner, J. L., Schnaiter, J. A., Bond-Williams, K. E., Carter, A. S., Ross, C. L., Just, B. L., Henselmans, M., & Krieger, J. W.
- Affiliations
- Lehman College (US)
- Oklahoma State University (US)
- Bayesian Bodybuilding, Gorinchem, the Netherlands; and
- Weightology, LLC, Redmond, Washington
- Corresponding author
- Schoenfeld, Brad J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1805-1812
- ISSN
- 1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2179150256
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 7 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 14.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Keywords
- resistance training, muscle strength, muscle hypertrophy, muscle thickness, muscular endurance, resistance-trained men, bench press, back squat, ultrasonography
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Arm, Humans, Hypertrophy, Male, Rest, Thigh, Time Factors, Ultrasonography, Quadriceps Muscle, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review