The effect of stance width on the electromyographical activity of eight superficial thigh muscles during back squat with different bar loads
Open accessAbstract
Many strength trainers believe that varying the stance width during the back squat can target specific muscles of the thigh. The aim of the present work was to test this theory measuring the activation of 8 thigh muscles while performing back squats at 3 stance widths and with 3 different bar loads. Six experienced lifters performed 3 sets of 10 repetitions of squats, each one with a different stance width, using 3 resistances: no load, 30% of 1-repetition maximum (1RM), and 70% 1RM. Sets were separated by 6 minutes of rest. Electromyographic (EMG) surface electrodes were placed on the vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, semitendinosus, biceps femoris, gluteus maximus, gluteus medium, and adductor maior. Analysis of variance and Scheffè post hoc tests indicated a significant difference in EMG activity only for the gluteus maximus; in particular, there was a higher electrical activity of this muscle when back squats were performed at the maximum stance widths at 0 and 70% 1RM. There were no significant differences concerning the EMG activity of the other analyzed muscles. These findings suggest that a large width is necessary for a greater activation of the gluteus maximus during back squats.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 7 · Cited by 126
- Authors
- Paoli, A., Marcolin, G., & Petrone, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Padua (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Paoli, Antonio
- Venue
- Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 246-250
- ISSN
- 1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059045638
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
- Keywords
- back squat, stance width, thigh muscle activation, muscle activation, resistance training, electromyography, biceps femoris
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Anthropometry, Electromyography, Humans, Male, Muscle Contraction, Probability, Thigh, Weight Lifting, Exercise, Weight-Bearing, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Weakness, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review