The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determining Variables of Plyometric Training for Improving Vertical Jump Height Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Plyometric training improves vertical jump height (VJH). However, the effectiveness of plyometric training depends on various factors. A meta-analysis of 56 studies with a total of 225 effect sizes (ESs) was carried out to analyze the role of various factors on the effects of plyometrics on VJH performance. The inclusion criteria for the analysis were a) studies using plyometric programs for lower-limb muscles, b) studies employing true experimental designs and valid and reliable measurements, and c) studies including enough data to calculate ESs. Subjects with more experience in sport obtained greater enhancements in VJH performance (p < 0.01). Subjects in either good or bad physical condition benefit equally from plyometric work (p < 0.05), although men tend to obtain better power results than women after plyometric training (p < 0.05). With relation to the variables of performance, training volumes of more than 10 weeks and more than 20 sessions, using high-intensity programs (with more than 50 jumps per session), were the strategies that seemed to maximize the probability of obtaining significantly greater improvements in performance (p < 0.05). To optimize jumping enhancement, the combination of different types of plyometrics (squat jump + countermovement jump + drop jump) is recommended rather than using only 1 form (p < 0.05). However, no extra benefits were found to be gained from doing plyometrics with added weight. The responses identified in this analysis are essential and should be considered by strength and conditioning professionals with regard to the most appropriate dose-response trends for optimizing plyometric-induced gains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 15,085
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
Wasserman, S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,326
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · The Statistician · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
RHEA, M. R. (2004) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/00124278-200411000-00040 · Cited by 1,069
Plyometric Training in Female Athletes: Decreased Impact Forces and Increased Hamstring Torques
Hewett, T. E., Stroupe, A. L., Nance, T. A., & Noyes, F. R. (1996) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/036354659602400611 · Cited by 1,017
9: Integrating Findings: The Meta-Analysis of Research
Glass, G. V. (1977) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x005001351 · Cited by 832
Utilization of stored elastic energy in leg extensor muscles by men and women.
Komi, P. V., & Bosco, C. (1978) · PubMed · Cited by 789
The optimal training load for the development of dynamic athletic performance
WILSON, G. J., NEWTON, R. U., MURPHY, A. J., & HUMPHRIES, B. J. (1993) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/00005768-199311000-00013 · Cited by 720
A Meta-analysis to Determine the Dose Response for Strength Development
RHEA, M. R., ALVAR, B. A., BURKETT, L. N., & BALL, S. D. (2003) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000053727.63505.d4 · Cited by 666 · cited 2×
“90 is accepted as an appropriate level of reliability in the coding procedure (74).”
Does plyometric training improve vertical jump height? A meta-analytical review
Markovic, G. (2007) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2007.035113 · Cited by 553
Cited by
Developing Maximal Neuromuscular Power: Part 1 – Biological Basis of Maximal Power Production
Cormie, P., McGuigan, M. R., & Newton, R. U. (2011) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/11537690-000000000-00000 · Cited by 774
Chelly, M. S., Ghenem, M. A., Abid, K., Hermassi, S., Tabka, Z., & Shephard, R. J. (2010) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181e2728f · Cited by 260
Weightlifting Pulling Derivatives: Rationale for Implementation and Application
Suchomel, T. J., Comfort, P., & Stone, M. H. (2015) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-015-0314-y · Cited by 150
Hackett, D., Davies, T., Soomro, N., & Halaki, M. (2016) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-094951 · Cited by 78
da Silva, L. X. N., Teodoro, J. L., Menger, E., Lopez, P., Grazioli, R., Farinha, J., Moraes, K., Bottaro, M., Pinto, R. S., Izquierdo, M., et al. (2018) · Experimental Gerontology · doi:10.1016/j.exger.2018.03.017 · Cited by 63
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- de Villarreal, E. S.-S., Kellis, E., Kraemer, W. J., & Izquierdo, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 495-506
- ISSN
- 1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004107350
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determining Variables of Plyometric Training for Improving Vertical Jump Height Performance: A Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1519/jsc.0b013e318196b7c6
- The paper
- de Villarreal, E. S.-S., Kellis, E., Kraemer, W. J., & Izquierdo, M. (2009). Determining Variables of Plyometric Training for Improving Vertical Jump Height Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e318196b7c6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.