Cited by 25Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Effects of Load and Contraction Velocity During Three-Week Biceps Curls Training on Isometric and Isokinetic Performance

Ingebrigtsen, Jørgen, Holtermann, Andreas, Roeleveld, Karin·2009·Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

The velocity-specificity principle in training is well established by studies applying isokinetic training devices. However, the contraction velocity during customary resistance training using barbells is rarely stable and can be manipulated in several ways. By manipulating load and intention of movement, the significance of contraction velocity during barbell training on gains in strength-related parameters was investigated. Twenty-seven subjects (divided into 3 experimental groups) performed standardized biceps curls 3 times a week for 3 weeks under the following conditions: high load and slow contraction velocity (HS), high load and fast contraction velocity (HF), and low load with fast contraction velocity (LF). Twelve subjects received no intervention, serving as controls (C). Elbow flexion strength was tested before and after the training period at both isometric and 4 isokinetic contraction velocities (30, 90, 240 and 300 degrees/sec) using a dynamometer. Rate of force development (RFD) was calculated in 100 millisecond epochs from isometric torque curves. Increased maximal isometric strength was seen in HF (9.7%), whereas HS improved slow isokinetic strength (8.5%). There were no improvements in force performance for LF and C. In none of the groups were changes in RFD observed. These findings support the principle of training specificity, highlighting the importance of details concerning contraction velocity on the outcome of resistance training using free weights.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181b3f37b

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few studies have equated work volume between different training groups.

    “Thus, few studies have equated work volume between the diff erent training groups [ 10 , 17 , 19 , 25 , 26 , 40 ]”
  • Movement velocity is dependent on both the magnitude of the load to overcome and the voluntary intent of the subject to move that load.

    “It is believed that movement velocity, which is dependent on both the magnitude of the load to overcome and the voluntary intent of the subject to move that load [ 17 , 31 ]”
  • Some isoinertial studies comparing fast- vs. slow-velocity training on strength found greater strength gains when performing repetitions at fast velocities.

    “some found greater strength gains when performing the repetitions at fast velocities [ 17 , 20 , 25 -27 ]”
  • Isoinertial weight training is the most commonly available type of RT and is generally considered to be the most specific to enhance sports performance.

    “Isoinertial (constant external load) weight training is the most commonly available type of RT and generally considered to be the most specifi c to enhance sports performance [ 17 , 29 ] .”
  • Some studies comparing fast vs intentionally slow movement velocities found greater strength gains when repetitions were performed at fast velocities.

    “Some of these studies found greater strength gains when performing the repetitions at fast velocities [ 17 , 20 , 25 -27 ]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ingebrigtsen, J., Holtermann, A., & Roeleveld, K.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Roeleveld, Karin
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2009-09
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
1670-1676
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017132513
Cited by
25
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
resistance training, biceps curl, contraction velocity, isokinetic strength, isometric strength, rate of force development, elbow flexion strength, free weights, training specificity
MeSH terms
Arm, Humans, Male, Muscle Contraction, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Muscle Strength Dynamometer, Resistance Training, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review