Effects of Load and Contraction Velocity During Three-Week Biceps Curls Training on Isometric and Isokinetic Performance
Abstract
The velocity-specificity principle in training is well established by studies applying isokinetic training devices. However, the contraction velocity during customary resistance training using barbells is rarely stable and can be manipulated in several ways. By manipulating load and intention of movement, the significance of contraction velocity during barbell training on gains in strength-related parameters was investigated. Twenty-seven subjects (divided into 3 experimental groups) performed standardized biceps curls 3 times a week for 3 weeks under the following conditions: high load and slow contraction velocity (HS), high load and fast contraction velocity (HF), and low load with fast contraction velocity (LF). Twelve subjects received no intervention, serving as controls (C). Elbow flexion strength was tested before and after the training period at both isometric and 4 isokinetic contraction velocities (30, 90, 240 and 300 degrees/sec) using a dynamometer. Rate of force development (RFD) was calculated in 100 millisecond epochs from isometric torque curves. Increased maximal isometric strength was seen in HF (9.7%), whereas HS improved slow isokinetic strength (8.5%). There were no improvements in force performance for LF and C. In none of the groups were changes in RFD observed. These findings support the principle of training specificity, highlighting the importance of details concerning contraction velocity on the outcome of resistance training using free weights.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Few studies have equated work volume between different training groups.
“Thus, few studies have equated work volume between the diff erent training groups [ 10 , 17 , 19 , 25 , 26 , 40 ]”
From Effect of Movement Velocity during Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance (2014) · cites this paper as [17]
Movement velocity is dependent on both the magnitude of the load to overcome and the voluntary intent of the subject to move that load.
“It is believed that movement velocity, which is dependent on both the magnitude of the load to overcome and the voluntary intent of the subject to move that load [ 17 , 31 ]”
From Effect of Movement Velocity during Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance (2014) · cites this paper as [17]
Some isoinertial studies comparing fast- vs. slow-velocity training on strength found greater strength gains when performing repetitions at fast velocities.
“some found greater strength gains when performing the repetitions at fast velocities [ 17 , 20 , 25 -27 ]”
From Effect of Movement Velocity during Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance (2014) · cites this paper as [17]
Isoinertial weight training is the most commonly available type of RT and is generally considered to be the most specific to enhance sports performance.
“Isoinertial (constant external load) weight training is the most commonly available type of RT and generally considered to be the most specifi c to enhance sports performance [ 17 , 29 ] .”
From Effect of Movement Velocity during Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance (2014) · cites this paper as [17]
Some studies comparing fast vs intentionally slow movement velocities found greater strength gains when repetitions were performed at fast velocities.
“Some of these studies found greater strength gains when performing the repetitions at fast velocities [ 17 , 20 , 25 -27 ]”
From Effect of Movement Velocity during Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance (2014) · cites this paper as [17]
Cites
A Meta-analysis to Determine the Dose Response for Strength Development
RHEA, M. R., ALVAR, B. A., BURKETT, L. N., & BALL, S. D. (2003) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000053727.63505.d4 · Cited by 666 · see citing works
Andersen, L. L., & Aagaard, P. (2006) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-005-0070-z · Cited by 657 · see citing works
Intended rather than actual movement velocity determines velocity-specific training response
Behm, D. G., & Sale, D. G. (1993) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1993.74.1.359 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Maximum Strength-Power-Performance Relationships in Collegiate Throwers
STONE, M. H., SANBORN, K., OʼBRYANT, H. S., HARTMAN, M., STONE, M. E., PROULX, C., WARD, B., & HRUBY, J. (2003) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/00124278-200311000-00019 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Movement Velocity in Resistance Training
Pereira, M. I. R., & Gomes, P. S. C. (2003) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200333060-00004 · Cited by 101 · cited 4× · see citing works
“these studies have been conducted in isokinetic or hydraulic devices (24), whereas movements in daily life, sports, and”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effect of Movement Velocity during Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance
Pareja-Blanco, F., Rodríguez-Rosell, D., Sánchez-Medina, L., Gorostiaga, E., & González-Badillo, J. (2014) · International Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-0033-1363985 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ingebrigtsen, J., Holtermann, A., & Roeleveld, K.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Roeleveld, Karin
- Venue
- Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1670-1676
- ISSN
- 1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017132513
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Keywords
- resistance training, biceps curl, contraction velocity, isokinetic strength, isometric strength, rate of force development, elbow flexion strength, free weights, training specificity
- MeSH terms
- Arm, Humans, Male, Muscle Contraction, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Muscle Strength Dynamometer, Resistance Training, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review